Question

explain briefly the three dimensional programme adopted by the government to eradicate the poverty in India ​

Answer 1

Explanation:

The three dimensions of the government's approach to reduce poverty in India are: ... Through this approach, programmes have supplemented the consumption of the poor, generation of employment opportunities and improvement of health and education.

Answer 2

Answer:

Poverty alleviation has always been accepted as one of the major objectives of planned development process in India but even after vast spending on poverty alleviation programmes, the government has not succeeded in poverty alleviation in India. Despite various strategies to alleviate poverty, problems like hunger, malnorishment illiteracy, and lack of basic amenities are prevalent in India. None of the poverty alleviation strategies resulted in any radical change in the ownership of assets, process of production and improvement of basic amenities to the needy. Due to unequal distribution of assets, the benefits from poverty alleviation programmes have not actually reached the poor. The amount of resources allocated for the poverty alleviation programmes is not sufficient when we take the magnitude of poverty into consideration. The implementation of the poverty alleviation programmes is the responsibility of government and bank officials who are ill motivated, inadequately trained, corruption prone and vulnerable to pressure from local elites. The resources are thus used inefficiently. Government policies have also failed to address the various issues related to poverty due to non – participation of local level institutions in programme implementation. It is evident that high growth alone is not sufficient to reduce poverty without the active participation of the people. Further, it is necessary to identify poverty stricken areas and provide infrastructure such as schools, roads, power, telecom, IT services, training institution s, etc. Institutional weaknesses abound and implementation failures are the biggest reasons that these programmes not succeeded.