Science, asked by uttu19, 1 year ago

explain fermats last theorem full explanation and formula explanation who will give ans I will Mark as brainlist but give correct answer

Answers

Answered by mah21
7
In number theoryFermat's Last Theorem (sometimes called Fermat's conjecture, especially in older texts) states that no three positive integers ab, and c satisfy the equation an + bn = cn for any integer value of n greater than 2. The cases n = 1 and n = 2 have been known to have infinitely many solutions since antiquity

mah21: thik hai mahisharma pr online ho rahi hoon ok
uttu19: ok
mah21: ab khush
uttu19: kyu nhi aana chahti thi
mah21: aa rahi hoon
mah21: 5 min wait
uttu19: madam 5min hua
uttu19: raat ko 8:30baje agar mujhse baat krne ka mann Ho toh Kr lena
uttu19: as your wish mahi
uttu19: bye
Answered by mahisharma21
7
Fermat's Last Theorem simple proofup vote1down votefavorite8I came across this simple proof of Fermat's last theorem. Some think it's legit. Some argued that the author's assumptions are flawed. It's rather lengthy but the first part goes like this:Let x,yx,y be 22 positive non-zero coprime integers and nn an integer greater than 22. According to the binomial theorem:(x+y)n=k=0n(nk)xn−kyk(x+y)n=k=0n(nk)xn−kykthen,(x+y)nxn=nxn−1y+k=2n−1(nk)xn−kyk+yn(x+y)nxn=nxn−1y+k=2n−1(nk)xn−kyk+yn(x+y)nxn=y(nxn−1+k=2n−1(nk)xn−kyk−1+yn−1)(x+y)nxn=y(nxn−1+k=2n−1(nk)xn−kyk−1+yn−1)y(nxn−1+k=2n−1(nk)xn−kyk−1+yn−1)=zny(nxn−1+k=2n−1(nk)xn−kyk−1+yn−1)=znIn the first case, he assumed that the 2 factors are coprime when gcd(y,n)=1gcd(y,n)=1 . Then he wrote:y=qny=qnnxn−1+k=2n−1(nk)xn−kyk−1+yn−1=pnnxn−1+k=2n−1(nk)xn−kyk−1+yn−1=pnBy replacing yy by qnqn,nxn−1+k=2n−1(nk)xn−kqn(k−1)+qn(n−1)=pn(∗)nxn−1+k=2n−1(nk)xn−kqn(k−1)+qn(n−1)=pn(∗)from this bivariate polynomial,he fixed alternatively xx and y=qny=qn and by applying the rational root theorem, he obtainedqn(n−1)pn=nxtqn(n−1)pn=nxtandnxn−1pn=qnsnxn−1pn=qns(s,ts,t non-zero integers) by equating pxpx:qn(n−1)−sqn=nx(t−xn−2)qn(n−1)−sqn=nx(t−xn−2)Then, he uses one of the trivial solutions of Fermat's equations. He wrote, when x+y=1x+y=1,if x=0x=0then y=1y=1 and vice versa.Therefore, he wrote: x=0x=0 iff qn(n−1)=sqnqn(n−1)=sqn, he obtains:q=1q=1ors=qn−2s=qn−2By substituting ss by qn−2qn−2 in nxn−1pn=qnsnxn−1pn=qns, he obtains:nxn−1pn=qn(n−1)nxn−1pn=qn(n−1)Then, he replace that expression in equation (*) and pointed out that:k=2n−1(nk)xn−kqn(k−1)=0k=2n−1(nk)xn−kqn(k−1)=0. Since x,y=qnx,y=qn are positive integers for all n>2n>2, a sum of positive numbers can not be equal to zero. Which leads to a contradiction.

uttu19: hllo Mr rahul
uttu19: I have to ask one thing
uttu19: where is your sister
mah21: m here
uttu19: hllo
uttu19: ok
uttu19: come to personal
mah21: or kitni personal aau
mah21: hahaha
uttu19: jitni aa ski ho
Similar questions