Explain Growth Relevant Movement in brief??
Answers
that movement building cannot be always better than direct work, but knowing how
to compare them presents a challenge.
In this article I introduce and explore a model of movement growth which tracks
individuals’ awareness of and inclination towards the movement. I aim to
understand when movement building activities are better or worse than direct work,
and apply the model to give my views on movement growth in the effective altruist
and related communities.
Part 1: Theory
In the first half of this paper I introduce a model for thinking about movement
growth, and terminology to refer to critical concepts. We model individuals as
having varying levels of awareness about the movement, and varying inclinations
towards it. We assume that these two characteristics can represent the major drivers
of interaction with the movement. We explore the consequences this
Awareness/Inclination Model (AIM), particularly looking at the long-term
counterfactual effects of direct work compared to ‘publicity’, which aims at increasing
awareness of the movement, and ‘advocacy’, which aims at improving inclinations
towards the movement. This involves analysing different possible long-term
trajectories the movement may be on.
If we accept the model, this has some general implications:
For early-stage movements, the effects on movement growth are a key
consideration in deciding between different activities. For relatively mature
movements, direct work is usually better than movement growth.
It is more important to focus on increasing awareness than improving
inclination, if:
o the movement has a natural maximum size that we cannot change; or
o essentially everyone will join the movement after they know enough
about it; or
o direct work earlier is much more important than direct work later; or
o it is very hard to change inclination relative to awareness.
Otherwise improving inclination may often be better than increasing
awareness (this is sensitive to beliefs about some parameters).
Answer:
Explanation:Movement growth may be very important for young social movements. It’s obvious
that movement building cannot be always better than direct work, but knowing how
to compare them presents a challenge.
In this article I introduce and explore a model of movement growth which tracks
individuals’ awareness of and inclination towards the movement. I aim to
understand when movement building activities are better or worse than direct work,
and apply the model to give my views on movement growth in the effective altruist
and related communities.
Part 1: Theory
In the first half of this paper I introduce a model for thinking about movement
growth, and terminology to refer to critical concepts. We model individuals as
having varying levels of awareness about the movement, and varying inclinations
towards it. We assume that these two characteristics can represent the major drivers
of interaction with the movement. We explore the consequences this
Awareness/Inclination Model (AIM), particularly looking at the long-term
counterfactual effects of direct work compared to ‘publicity’, which aims at increasing
awareness of the movement, and ‘advocacy’, which aims at improving inclinations
towards the movement. This involves analysing different possible long-term
trajectories the movement may be on.
If we accept the model, this has some general implications:
For early-stage movements, the effects on movement growth are a key
consideration in deciding between different activities. For relatively mature
movements, direct work is usually better than movement growth.
It is more important to focus on increasing awareness than improving
inclination, if:
o the movement has a natural maximum size that we cannot change; or
o essentially everyone will join the movement after they know enough
about it; or
o direct work earlier is much more important than direct work later; or
o it is very hard to change inclination relative to awareness.
Otherwise improving inclination may often be better than increasing
awareness (this is sensitive to beliefs about some parameters).
Read more on Brainly.in - https://brainly.in/question/1915820#readmoreMovement growth may be very important for young social movements. It’s obvious
that movement building cannot be always better than direct work, but knowing how
to compare them presents a challenge.
In this article I introduce and explore a model of movement growth which tracks
individuals’ awareness of and inclination towards the movement. I aim to
understand when movement building activities are better or worse than direct work,
and apply the model to give my views on movement growth in the effective altruist
and related communities.
Part 1: Theory
In the first half of this paper I introduce a model for thinking about movement
growth, and terminology to refer to critical concepts. We model individuals as
having varying levels of awareness about the movement, and varying inclinations
towards it. We assume that these two characteristics can represent the major drivers
of interaction with the movement. We explore the consequences this
Awareness/Inclination Model (AIM), particularly looking at the long-term
counterfactual effects of direct work compared to ‘publicity’, which aims at increasing
awareness of the movement, and ‘advocacy’, which aims at improving inclinations
towards the movement. This involves analysing different possible long-term
trajectories the movement may be on.
If we accept the model, this has some general implications:
For early-stage movements, the effects on movement growth are a key
consideration in deciding between different activities. For relatively mature
movements, direct work is usually better than movement growth.
It is more important to focus on increasing awareness than improving
inclination, if:
o the movement has a natural maximum size that we cannot change; or
o essentially everyone will join the movement after they know enough
about it; or
o direct work earlier is much more important than direct work later; or
o it is very hard to change inclination relative to awareness.
Otherwise improving inclination may often be better than increasing
awareness (this is sensitive to beliefs about some parameters).