Social Sciences, asked by hzayy14, 6 months ago

Explain how being able to create bricks might have affected the Early
River Valley Civilizations.
plz help me

Answers

Answered by Anonymous

Answer:

of Sumer created solutions to deal with these problems. To provide water, they dug irrigation ditches that carried river water to their fields and allowed them to produce a surplus of crops. For defense, they built city walls with mud bricks.

Explanation:

mark me brainliest

Answered by ravilaccs

Answer:

Mud brick was the most common construction material used in the IVC [Indus Valley Civilization] villages and towns. Only during the Mature period were baked bricks employed in large quantities, particularly repairing water-damaged walls and flooring. This baked brick phase corresponds with the IVC's urban period, with several big cities as contrast to the dominating village settlements before and after the Mature phase. This leads them to define the "chronological dynamics of brick usage by typology and a fresh point of departure for exploring the various explanations for the unexplained decrease IVC decline" in this paper, which elegantly sets out the facts regarding Indus bricks.

Explanation:

What we know about them comes from the excavations of their towns. We know they used bricks - sun-dried for above-ground building, but kiln-dried for longer lasting, more expensive foundation work. Their two big cities were set out in very identical, highly tidy grid layouts, with covered drainpipes that were thought to transport waste. Many of their residences were several storeys tall, with private drainage systems that connected to city sewers. A massive edifice in the heart of Mohenjo-daro had a large tank or pools with waterproof linings and pipelines capable of filling them with water. (Go look at an excellent shot of this Great Bath archaeological site.)
Water was clearly important not only for Indus farming, but also for life within its cities. The cities also featured walls, probably for defence against any external assaults. Most researchers agree that strong organised leadership was required to accomplish such consistent, labor-intensive city-wide brick construction, but they don't know what type of power or elites were involved, or if they persuaded or coerced adherence. We do know that the bronze spearpoints found were very fragile and likely to crumble after one use.
We also know that the Indus peoples were highly excellent metalworkers, had access to large amounts of metal ore, and were able to adjust the exact proportions of bronze alloy to match specific purposes. As a result, some academics argue that spearpoints were considered as not requiring to be used again. This would imply a culture that was not dominated by soldiers involved in regular, severe battle. If this is the case, it is easy to speculate that Indus region priests held a bigger proportion of authority than those in city-state Mesopotamia.
This reality is properly portrayed in the Priest-King appellation commonly given to the Mohenjo-daro statue of what appears to be an aristocratic guy of some type.
Scholars have discovered solid evidence of advanced civilisation from artefacts discovered in excavations at not just Mohenjo-daro and Harappa, but also numerous other minor sites. The presence of seals and tablets indicates that the Indus peoples possessed writing, albeit it has yet to be decoded. These seals were most likely used to create individual "signatures" for whatever company a person was doing. Excavations also yield fine ceramics and several beautiful metalwork items.

Reference Link