Explain how technological advancements changed the war giving examples and case studies
Answers
Explanation:
War made the state, and the state made war, but does this statement hold true today? Will it apply in the future? The consensus is that the absence of major war within the western world, post 1945, did cause the war–state relationship to change, but each became significantly less important to the other. This article argues that the relationship was closer and deeper than has been assumed. It proposes that the peculiar strategic conditions created by the nuclear age caused states to wage a ritualistic style of war, in which demonstration rather than the physical application of violence became increasingly important. Within this setting, the state drove the process of technological innovation in defence to its limits in an effort to demonstrate its military superiority. This massive peacetime investment in defence technology exerted a huge impact on the character of war, which led to new strategic forms. However, most importantly, the diffusion of military technology also affected the wider economy and society, leading to a form of internal power transition within states. The author speculates on how these elemental forces will play out in the future, what will happen to war and the state, and whether we will reach a point where war leads to the unmaking of the state.
Answer:
PLS MARK BRAINLIEST
Explanation:War made the state, and the state made war, but does this statement hold true today? Will it apply in the future? The consensus is that the absence of major war within the western world, post 1945, did cause the war–state relationship to change, but each became significantly less important to the other. This article argues that the relationship was closer and deeper than has been assumed. It proposes that the peculiar strategic conditions created by the nuclear age caused states to wage a ritualistic style of war, in which demonstration rather than the physical application of violence became increasingly important. Within this setting, the state drove the process of technological innovation in defence to its limits in an effort to demonstrate its military superiority. This massive peacetime investment in defence technology exerted a huge impact on the character of war, which led to new strategic forms. However, most importantly, the diffusion of military technology also affected the wider economy and society, leading to a form of internal power transition within states. The author speculates on how these elemental forces will play out in the future, what will happen to war and the state, and whether we will reach a point where war leads to the unmaking of the state.Artillery, naval gun fire, attack helicopters and fighter craft were the next advanced warfare technologies that were used in killing the enemies. Technology has always been the contributing factor to the advancement and development of war equipment's. They played a significant role in the way war was fought.It is the instrumentality of warfare. The most important verb describing the impact of technology on warfare is that it changes warfare. Technology has been the primary source of military innovation throughout history. It drives changes in warfare more than any other factor.he frequent incidence of civil conflict in poor countries and its tendency to recur mean that it is responsible for some of the most serious aspects of underdevelopment — malnutrition, poor education, and endemic disease. This volume of the study contains eight case studies which examine seven countries in depth, using primary sources. Important insights can be gleaned from these case studies because they reveal the interaction between political and economic developments, between external and domestic actors, between the military and civilians, and between leaders and led. This chapter provides an introduction to our eight case studies. The second section provides the analytical framework which provided the background to the case studies. The third section explains the selection of investigated countries and provides a comparative overview of the main findings of the country studies. Finally, the last section provides an overview of the conclusions of the study and key policy recommendations.