Question

Explain how the case of Miranda v. Arizona exemplifies the different steps of the state court system.

Answer 1

$\huge \fbox \red{❥ Answer}$

Actually The Miranda v. Arizona was a significant Supreme Court case that ruled that a defendant's statements to authorities are inadmissible in court unless the defendant has been informed of their right to have an attorney present during questioning and an understanding that anything they say will be held against them.

Answer 2

Answer:In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. ... Miranda appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reviewed the case in 1966.

Explanation:

Hope you understand please mark me as brainlist