explain , how the information from the manuscripts could be misleading or wrong
Answers
Answer:
n the span of last two years, I have been fortunate to review over100s of manuscripts submitted in the Journals of Photonics, Magnetics / Magneto-optics, Applied Physics, Material Science, etc. It's almost impossible to find a single manuscript where I can recommend "Accept as is". Many papers are so badly written that they deserve to be rejected. However, I do not like to reject papers. That means, I do not look at the text only but I focus more on the significance of the results presented.
Partly, the problem starts right from the undergraduate study and failure to train students how to write concise papers. So, what to investigate in the submitted manuscripts then? Succinctness? A manuscript I was reviewing lately had over 200 words-long abstract, 400-words long introduction section and 450 words-long conclusion section. Is this structure (A200-I400-Body-C450) weird / abnormal, especially the length of the conclusion section?