Question

Explain language creative and Infinite?

Answer 1

                              Language is Creative and Infinite

 

It is absolutely true language is creative and infinite. Language is very important for man. It makes the hidden phenomena perceptible and comprehensible. All the entertaining stories that inspired and hard-working men conceive; all the wisdom that sages, prophets, and seers garner from the harvest of their efforts; all the secrets related to various fields that the scientists and researchers discover become known to the entire mankind through language only.

Would the world be able to read the insightful and absorbing plays of Shakespeare if there were no language? In fact, all the books we read; all the songs that we listen; all the poems that we compose; all the movies we enjoy would not come to being if there were no language.

Language is quite creative. The magical world portrayed in books is painted with the color of language. For example, the imaginary world depicted in Harry Potter could only be created because of language. Similarly, the theories that Einstein, Addison, Newton, J.C. Bose, C.V. Raman wrote in books, could not be available for the entire mankind to read and learn without the creativity of the language.

Language is infinite. Language is imitation of life. Life itself is infinite, and so is language. Language, like life is evolving always. For example, in the past language had not developed so much. However, as man’s understanding about life grew wider, so did language. Language has the potential to be as infinite as life but it will require ages for that to happen. There exist infinite phenomena, species, processes that still remain to be named and defined. Once these come under the purview of man, man will develop language for them too.

Language is very creative and infinite. Without language the world would not be as advanced and beautiful as it is with it!       

 

Answer 2

A little arrangement of rules working on a huge however limited arrangement of words produces an infinite number of sentences. The issue with this definition is that it expects an extremely limited and discrete perspective of all components: rules, lexical things, sentences. Language isn't composed of sentences and the difference amongst words and rules is likely an ancient rarity of dictionary making and grammar writing. 

It truly does not make a difference whether language is infinite by any means (other than to keep certain formal hypotheses inside consistent). What is important is that any language will permit an arrangement of expressions that is adequately extensive for any reason a human language can be put towards. 

Can a finite arrangement of words portray a boundless arrangement of thoughts? This makes a few baseless suppositions. To begin with, words don't portray thoughts, they are utilized to make expressions (by rules on the off chance that you subscribe to the words/rules hypothesis of language or unification on the off chance that you don't). Second, expressions don't generally straightforwardly outline a discrete arrangement of thoughts/ideas/concepts. They co-make them. So somehow the question has neither rhyme nor reason. 

In any case, regardless of the possibility that you subscribed to the shortsighted thought of 'String of words'='Idea', you could create enough strings in a language to sufficiently coordinate plans to last people whatever remains of the presence of Earth paying little mind to whether a language is limited or not.