explain stylistic colouring and stylistic neutrality?
Answers
Answer:
Most scholars abroad and in this country think that "style" may be defined as a deviation from the lingual norm. It means that what is stylistically relevant or stylistically coloured is a departure from the norm of a given national language (G.Leech, M.Riffaterre, M.Halliday, R. Jacobson and others).
Some scholars object to the use of the term "norm". Thus Y.M. Skrebnev claims the existence of a variety of sublanguages within a national language, so he says that each sublanguage has a norm of its own.
E.g.: the sentence "I haven't ever done anything", compared to "I ain't never done nothing" is not the norm itself but conforms to (соответствует) the literary norm.
The sentence "I ain't never done nothing" deviates from the literary norm, from standard English but comforms to the standards of the uncultivated population who have their own idea of the norm. So Skrebnev claims there are as many norms as there are sublanguages
Explanation:
please Mark me as brainliest please please please please please please please please