Explain the advantages and disadvantages of using observation in natural settings as a research method in Piliavin, Rodin and Piliavin’s 1969 study: ‘Good Samaritan: An underground phenomenon.’
Answers
Answer:
One advantage of naturalistic observation is that it allows researchers to evaluate their subjects or subject in an organic environment. It lets them study how their subject or subjects act in a setting that is not contrived by them.
In "Good samaritanism: an underground phenomenon?" the three researches were able to view how their subjects would react in an actual train. The verisimilitude of the subway setting seemed to give the researchers more accurate results or data.
Explanation:
In the "Good samaritanism" study, naturalistic observation allowed the researchers to examine how people would react on a real subway ride. The organic situation helped give them authentic results and even led to a surprise discovery about group size. One drawback of naturalistic observation is the subjectivity of observation. Observations can produce conflicting conclusions.