explain the autocratic rule of Tsar Nicholas 2
Answers
Answered by
46
In 1914, Tsar Nicholas II was the emperor of Russia.
Along with Russia, He also ruled present day Moscow, Finland, Latvia, Estonia, Ukraine, Belarus and some parts of Poland.
Later on, His territory stretched to Central Asian States like Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan.
The majority was Orthodox Christian.
In 1905, there was a wave of political and social movements and revolts in Russia demanding greater democratic rights to the people that they were entitled of
However, the Tsar suppressed the Revolution violently with his powers. Unarmed protestors were fired upon when they went to give a petition to the Tsar. But still there was an effect of the revolt. The Revolution did led to the establishment of the Duma as the Russian Parliament. However, the Tsar refused and ruled himself. The first Duma was ended within 75 days.
The autocratic rule of the Tsar was also perceived to have contributed to the military weakening of Russia in a great way. The Tsar frequently refused to listen to military advice and insisted on taking military decisions himself which clearly mentioned that he was an arrogant person.As a result of his military failures, Russia lost the Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and also suffered severe setbacks in the First World War which lead to shortage of several essential needs.
Along with Russia, He also ruled present day Moscow, Finland, Latvia, Estonia, Ukraine, Belarus and some parts of Poland.
Later on, His territory stretched to Central Asian States like Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan.
The majority was Orthodox Christian.
In 1905, there was a wave of political and social movements and revolts in Russia demanding greater democratic rights to the people that they were entitled of
However, the Tsar suppressed the Revolution violently with his powers. Unarmed protestors were fired upon when they went to give a petition to the Tsar. But still there was an effect of the revolt. The Revolution did led to the establishment of the Duma as the Russian Parliament. However, the Tsar refused and ruled himself. The first Duma was ended within 75 days.
The autocratic rule of the Tsar was also perceived to have contributed to the military weakening of Russia in a great way. The Tsar frequently refused to listen to military advice and insisted on taking military decisions himself which clearly mentioned that he was an arrogant person.As a result of his military failures, Russia lost the Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and also suffered severe setbacks in the First World War which lead to shortage of several essential needs.
Answered by
30
Answer:
Tsar Nicholas II was the last tsar to rule Russia. His death led to the end of Romanov dynasty. As a Tsar, he lacked the presence, confidence and assertiveness of a ruler. As an autocratic ruler, Nicholas II was not able to rule Russia accurately, which led to his abdication and execution. He believed in an autocracy, which means a ruler must possess all the power that is, absolute power. During his reign, Russia saw industrial progress, while agriculture lagged. The political system remained the same in the beginning, but it changed with establishing an elected legislature.
Similar questions