Explain the differences between Nazism and British rule
Answers
The Britons established their empire by its proximity first. They made up the empire by partly, allying with the pirates. This is why in the history, many pirates were of English/Scottish/Irish/Welsh ancestry. But funny is, it was those pirates which began the glory of British Empire.
While those British pirates kept indirect relations with London, it also helped Britain to expand its legacy and its influence. Such as the language, they occupied and then they spread it out, and enforcing locals to learn it. On the other side, Britain also maintained a private company, the British East India Company - which worked well better than any other East Indie Companies. Same double cards, Britain’s influence grew by using illegal bandits (pirates) and legal settlers (British people and the East India Company).
The core of developing Imperial economy was also totally different. During the British rule in most of its colonies, instead of harvesting resources to Britain like the French, Russian or Spanish counterparts, they built up factories, railway systems, industries, healthcare hospitals, military, facilities right in their colonies. And it was them who introduced its Britannia towards its colonies. Even the United States, while it totally followed a different doctrine than Britain, American style is also heavily influenced by the British. Privitization was also encouraged and they even built up House of Representatives in its colonies.
Thus, even the British Empire only existed at 17th century (pure opening) to 1950s (their end), the British legacy remains so strong that no one is willing to reject it. But of course, some colonies like Myanmar is excluded because of failure. The American doctrines of rebuilding some countries after WWII was also, close to how Britain had done.
The German Nazi Empire, on another side, came after its failure of WWI and the crisis of Weimar Republic. Hitler ought to think, he would rebuild what had been, the great German nation and he thought he could become like Frederick the Great. This became his illusion.
He chose nationalisation and made up a very, very heavy military society. He discouraged privitization although he did not ban it. He did not have any gangsters serving German goods so instead he had to ally with Japan and Italy. He also revived the weak economy of German Republic but also imposed a dictatorship.
This is why Nazi Germany went so strong.
But, he made a mistake: he treated with non-Germanic peoples with an eyes of cruelity and he sought to kill all Jews, Slavs and Romas. Even he invaded every countries and merciless to them. On the other side, Nazi Empire also gave places for many great people and great scientists, but many of them disappeared after World War II, leaving a brain drain.
The Nazi Empire was a short-lived success model, but a disaster in the future. And this made the Nazi Empire collapsed and no one remembered the Empire anymore.
Well, Nazi Empire was a short-tempered hot-head empire. British Empire was a long-run empire.
hey mate plz mark as brainlist
Let's start by saying both were fundamentally different. Nazism was a product of humiliation of Germany during French revolution and Nepolean , who occupied Germany and appointed a Duke who was not from Germany (like Britishers , surprising it may be but French and British history are intertwined) this worsened the economic conditi Germany and even living standards were drastically falling, this paved the way for a mass nationalist moment headed by the infamous Adolf Hitler . It may be noticed that there was uses of word such as right fullness and justice when nazi movement started but later turned towards racial supremacy and world dominance when things in home were good for the Nazi's
ihope you like my answer sir