Explain the Indra swahey and others vs union of India along with its major reforms
Answers
Answered by
2
Some persons and associations opposed the order of government of implementing reservation and filed a number of cases in the courts. People appealed to the courts to declarethe order invalid and stop its implementation.
The Supreme Court of India bunched all these cases together and this case came to be known as the ‘Indira Sawhney Case’. Eleven judges of the Supreme Court heard arguments of both sides. By a majority, the Supreme Court Judges in 1992 declared the order of government was valid. . Supreme Court modified the original order and declared.
That well-to-do persons among the backward classes should be excluded from getting benefit of the reservation. Hence, the Department of Personnel and Training issued another Office Memorandum on 8th September, 1993.
The Supreme Court of India bunched all these cases together and this case came to be known as the ‘Indira Sawhney Case’. Eleven judges of the Supreme Court heard arguments of both sides. By a majority, the Supreme Court Judges in 1992 declared the order of government was valid. . Supreme Court modified the original order and declared.
That well-to-do persons among the backward classes should be excluded from getting benefit of the reservation. Hence, the Department of Personnel and Training issued another Office Memorandum on 8th September, 1993.
Answered by
0
Supreme court in Indira Sawhney & Ors v. Union of India. AIR 1993 SC 477 : 1992 Supp (3)SCC 217 upheld Implementation of separate reservation for other backward classes in central government jobs. Ordered to exclude Creamy layer of other backward classes from enjoying reservation facilities.
Similar questions