explain the principles of sustainable development in 60 words
Answers
Explanation:
The report on sustainable development in our common future identifies three leading interconnected principles viz. environmental efficiency, inter and intra-generational social justice and participation in Sustainability. ... Therefore, sustainability is made up of three pillars: economy, society, and the environment. These principles are also The principles of sustainable development are as follows: Conservation of ecosystem. Development of sustainable society. Conservation of biodiversity. used as profit, people and planet.May 22, 2019 making.
Answer:IF IT HELPS PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIST SEND ME FRIEND REQUEST OR FOLLOW ME
Explanation:The review was guided by aspects of the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA) guidelines (Moher et al., 2009; Tranfield, Denyer, & Smart, 2003). Secondary data were collected through review of relevant materials including articles, theses, conference presentations and other documents available on the internet. The documents were identified through a combination of searches, using keywords and terms associated with SD. These included sustainability, development, sustainable development, economic sustainability, social sustainability, environmental sustainability and sustainable development goals. No date restrictions were imposed on the search as priority was given to the relevance of the materials in terms of their substantial contribution to the ongoing discourse on SD, irrespective of the age of the material. Attempts, however, were made to capture as much recent literature as possible in order to reflect the currency and increasing relevance of the topic.
Literature that was not related to sustainability and development was excluded. However, in order to avoid the risk of missing potentially relevant literature, reference lists of selected articles were scanned for related materials to the topic under study. Information, including title and abstract, was reviewed for articles and other publications identified in the search. Selected materials meeting pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria and were coherent with the topic of interest were included in the review. The general inclusion criteria were relevance, authority and currency (Browning & Rigolon, 2019; Wolf et al., 2014). Relevance had to do with how the material had contributed to the SD discourse, while authority refers to whether it had been published by a reputable source or the material had been peer-reviewed or professionally edited, Currency, on the other hand, was defined in terms of whether the material was still influential regarding the debate on SD (Browning & Rigolon, 2019) as evidenced, for example, by citations. The initial search criteria identified a total of 1154 references. However, applying the screening and eligibility processes stated above, 61 articles were identified for full-text retrieval, out of which 26 were identified as meeting the final inclusion criteria as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Material selection algorithm.
Display full size
The full texts were read thoroughly in order to extract the relevant information. Pieces of information gathered were analysed, combining the qualitative content analysis (Elo & Kyngäs, 2008; Hsieh & Shannon, 2005; Mayring, 2000) and recursive abstraction (Leshan, 2012) techniques. That is, the contents were summarized under themes without coding but with notes; In this regard, the relevant information were summarised repeatedly, guided by the keywords and phrases already mentioned. The series of summarizing, which were manually done, were aimed at bringing out the basic results with regard to the viewpoints of each input data and to remove discrepancies and irrelevant data. The reasons for discarding particular aspects of each summary result were noted while each summary was being prepared in order not to forget the reasons for their exclusion. Pieces of information gathered through the summaries were synthesised, interlinked and paraphrased to make them more condensed, concise, coherent and manageable, being careful not to change the meaning of the data when combining the themes. The end result was a more concise and refined summary of the relevant literature regarding the key issues as presented below.