History, asked by prachi2295, 2 months ago

Explain the statements with reason: Historical methods were not of lesser quality though they differed from scientific methods.​

Answers

Answered by rndrahul12
19

Answer:

Historical method is the collection of techniques and guidelines that historians use to research and write histories of the past. Secondary sources, primary sources and material evidence such as that derived from archaeology may all be drawn on, and the historian's skill lies in identifying these sources, evaluating their relative authority, and combining their testimony appropriately in order to construct an accurate and reliable picture of past events and environments

Explanation:

Answered by divyanjali714
0

Answer:

The term historical methodology refers to the gathering of techniques and tips that historians use to analysis and write histories of the past. Secondary sources, primary sources and material proof like that derived from anthropology might all be drawn on, and also the historian's ability lies in distinctive these sources, evaluating their relative authority, and mixing their testimony fittingly so as to construct AN correct and reliable image of past events and environments.

This final section surveys up to date historical observe and theory. because the previous section has incontestible, there area unit several branches of history these days, every with totally different forms of proof, explicit canons of interpretation, and distinctive conventions of writing.

#SPJ2

Similar questions