Explain the story Father's help
Answers
Answer:
Toward the start of the story, we discover Swamy the hero of the story plays truant and untruths his mother that he has a headache.
As he indicated hesitance to go to school his mother inquired as to whether he had any important exercises that day.
In answer, Swamy opined that the topography teacher had been teaching a similar exercise for over a year now and math period implied for the entire time frame the students would have been rebuffed.
His liberal mother allowed him to remain at home. Despite the fact that he could trick his mother, by the passage of his difficult father, his destiny took another turn.
When he understood that he couldn't alter the circumstance to his headache, he changed his tactics.
He told his father that he would be rebuffed by his teacher on the off chance that he went late to school.
To substantiate his contention, he gave an offensive record of lie in regards to his teacher Samuel, that he would beat children until the point that he saw blood., and made them smear it on their temple like a vermillion checking.
Hearing this, his inflexible father constrained Swamy to school with a letter tended to the headmaster.
On his approach to school, Swamy felt that he was the most noticeably awful liar on earth.
Aside from the noise, there was no information of Samuel savageries inside his psyche.
To legitimize what has been written in the letter he needed Samuel to accomplish something.
So he chose to convey the letter toward the day's end.
Answer:
.. ANS = ✔️
Explanation:
Answer = ‘Father’s Help’ is a short story written by R. K. Narayan (1906-2001) an Indian English short story-teller and novelist. The main theme of the story is a pretext for not going to school. The story depicts the child psychology and shows how a child’s minds work to device out a trick for shirking his duty.
‘Father’s Help’ is a short story written by R. K. Narayan (1906-2001) an Indian English short story-teller and novelist. The main theme of the story is a pretext for not going to school. The story depicts the child psychology and shows how a child’s minds work to device out a trick for shirking his duty.The story revolves round a school-boy named Swaminathan. He is a student of Albert Mission School. Like some boys he despises school going and finds a pretext for not going to school. One Monday morning he decided not to go to school and finds a pretext that he has a headache. His mother allows him to stay home but when his father comes to know about his headache then he becomes stubborn and says to him that he must go to school. Swaminathan replies that he is unwilling to go to school late as his teacher Samuel would beat him. Then Swami gives a brief but vivid imaginary account of Samuel’s violent character and says that he is so rude to the boys who go to school late. He canes the boys very vehemently and not stops till he sees blood on the boy’s hand which he makes the boy smear on his face. He also reports that once the teacher had skinned the knuckle of a boy. Hearing this Swami’s father becomes exasperated with the teacher and writes a rude letter to the Headmaster complaining against Samuel and gives it to Swami to deliver it to him. On the way while going to school Swami’s conscience bothered him for making a false statement about Samuel. However, he devises out a fault with the teacher’s treatment of his students. Going to school he finds the teacher more genial and kind than ever before. The teacher neither abuses him nor canes him. The boy, however, shows rudeness with the teacher in the class. While the school breaks then he rushes to the Headmaster’s chamber and seeing the room locked he asks the peon and comes to know that he is on a leave for a week. He does not deliver the letter and returns home straight. His father asks him about the letter and then snatching the letter from Swami’s hand tears off it and throws it into the wastepaper box and mutters that he deserves the punishment of Samuel.
The story, in Structure, is well one. The exposition is direct. The complication of the story begins with Swami’s going to school carrying about the letter written by his father to the Headmaster against Samuel. The story reaches its climax when Samuel behaves rudely in the last class taken by Samuel. The denouement happens when Samuel returns home without delivering the letter. The Setting of the story is consistent with the events and situation. The author gives a good deal of description of the atmosphere and manners of his characters.
The story, in Structure, is well one. The exposition is direct. The complication of the story begins with Swami’s going to school carrying about the letter written by his father to the Headmaster against Samuel. The story reaches its climax when Samuel behaves rudely in the last class taken by Samuel. The denouement happens when Samuel returns home without delivering the letter. The Setting of the story is consistent with the events and situation. The author gives a good deal of description of the atmosphere and manners of his characters. The Dialogues employed in the story is very logical as he uses them economically but all the dialogues have taken his story a step ahead and unfold the inner nature and motives of his characters.
The story, in Structure, is well one. The exposition is direct. The complication of the story begins with Swami’s going to school carrying about the letter written by his father to the Headmaster against Samuel. The story reaches its climax when Samuel behaves rudely in the last class taken by Samuel. The denouement happens when Samuel returns home without delivering the letter. The Setting of the story is consistent with the events and situation. The author gives a good deal of description of the atmosphere and manners of his characters. The Dialogues employed in the story is very logical as he uses them economically but all the dialogues have taken his story a step ahead and unfold the inner nature and motives of his characters.The author has expressed his Philosophy of Life not directly but indirectly through the story and suggests that a child suffers for his own fault.