History, asked by sakshi7394, 1 year ago

explain the system of "subsidiary alliance" ​

Answers

Answered by ItsMeKing
15

Explanation:

An Indian ruler entering into a subsidiary alliance with the British had to accept British forces in his territory and also agreed to pay for their maintenance.

Such a ruler would not form an alliance with any other power, nor would he declare war against any power without the permission of the British.

The ruler would not employ any Europeans other than the British, and if he were already doing so, he would dismiss them.

In case of a conflict with any other state, the British would decide what to do, and he would accept their solution.

The ruler would acknowledge the East India Company as the power in India.

In return for the ruler accepting its conditions, the Company undertook to protect the state from external dangers and internal disorders.

If the Indian rulers failed to make the payments required by the alliance, then part of their territory was to be taken away as a penalty.

HOPE IT HELPS U AND PLEASE MARK IT THE BRIANLIEST ANSWER

Answered by Anonymous
24

\large{\boxed{\red{\textbf{Thanks \: for \: asking }}}}

The system of the subsidiary alliance made Indian rulers let go of their armed forces and come under the protection of East India Company. The following changes occurred when this system came into being:

a. East India Company became the guardian of the territories that it took under the alliance

b. An English resident, who served as the EIC’s personnel, was appointed in the territory to keep a check on the ruler

c. The Indian rules were asked not to allow any other European companies to trade with them and enter their territory

d. Indian rulers were told to pay for the subsidiary armed forces of the EIC, disobeying which led to that part of the territory being forfeited by the company

Similar questions