History, asked by sahoorudramadhab2007, 6 months ago

Explain the term 'subsidiary alliance'​

Answers

Answered by maithilidawoor
8

Answer:

According to the Subsidiary alliance the Indian rulers were assured of British military help. There were some terms laid on them. The Indian rulers have to maintain British army in their court and have to pay cash or part of their territory to the company for its maintenance. The ruler would not have any alliance with any other power or declare war against any power without the intervention of the British. The ruler would accept a British resident in his state. Some Indian rulers accepted the system and lost their freedom

Answered by puppy56
4

Answer:

  • Introduction
  • Features of subsidiary alliance
  • Effects of subsidiary alliance

Explanation:

Introduction :-

Subsidiary Alliance was basically a treaty between the British East India Company and the Indian princely states, by virtue of which the Indian kingdoms lost their sovereignty to the English.

It also was a major process that led to the building of the British Empire in India.

It was framed by Lord Wellesley, the Governor-General of India from 1798 to 1805.

It was actually used for the first time by the French Governor-General Marquis Dupleix.

The Nawab of Awadh was the first ruler to enter into the subsidiary alliance with the British after the Battle of Buxar.

However, The Nizam of Hyderabad was the first to accept a well-framed subsidiary alliance.

Features of the Subsidiary Alliance Treaty :-

The subsidiary alliance in India was planned by Lord Wellesley but this term was introduced by French Governor Dupleix.

An Indian ruler entering into Subsidiary Alliance with the British had to dissolve his own armed forces and accept British forces in his territory.

He also had to pay for the British army’s maintenance.

If he failed to make the payment, a portion of his territory would be taken away and ceded to the British.

In return, the British would protect the Indian state against any foreign attack or internal revolt.

The British promised non-interference in internal affairs of the Indian state but this was rarely kept.

The Indian state could not enter into any alliance with any other foreign power.

He could also not employ any other foreign nationals other than Englishmen in his service. And, if he were employing any, on the signing of the alliance, he had to terminate them from his service. The idea was to curb the influence of the French.

The Indian state could also not enter into any political connection with another Indian state without British approval.

The Indian ruler, thus, lost all powers in respect of foreign affairs and the military. He virtually lost all his independence and became a British ‘protectorate’.

A British Resident was also stationed in the Indian Court.

Effects of the Subsidiary Alliance :-

As a result of Indian rulers disbanding their armies, many people were rendered unemployed.

Many Indian states lost their independence and slowly, most parts of India were coming under British control.

The Nizam of Hyderabad was the first to accept the Subsidiary Alliance in 1798.

Lord Clive also introduced the subsidiary system in Oudh and the Treaty of Allahabad was signed where the British promised the Oudh territory from enemies like Marathas.

Hope it helps u..!

Similar questions