Explain the three pillars of democracy by brainly
Answers
Answer:
The Three Powers: Legislature, Executive, Judiciary
Checks and balances (rights of mutual control and influence) make sure that thethree powers interact in an equitable and balanced way. The separation of powers is an essential element of the Rule of Law, and is enshrined in the Constitution.
Explanation:
HOPE IT MAY HELP YOU
Answer:
the three pillars – legislature, executive and judiciary – under the Constitution have held their own, worked as B.R. Ambedkar and the other wise men and women of the Constituent Assembly would have wanted them to. They wanted them to work cohesively, but they also wanted each of these three wings to function independently, with clearly defined separation of powers.
Explanation: legislature
The most important, although not the most powerful, wing under the Constitution has unfortunately degenerated into an arena where politicians work more to safeguard the interests of their parties than for those who elect them. Debate, the oxygen of any functioning democratic institution, is something that we seldom witness in our Parliament and the state legislatures. Instead, we have monologues guided mostly by the party and, sometimes, personal line.
Lawmaking has taken a back seat and MPs don’t show much interest in knowing how a law would affect us.
e executionThe job of the executive was to ensure proper implementation of the laws passed by the legislature and also govern. However, with the executive now looking more like an extension of the dysfunctional legislature than a separate wing, the edifice is crumbling.
The famed steel frame – as Sardar Patel called the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) – is now more structure that is falling Bureaucrats, who were supposed to uphold the rule of the law and keep the politicians in check, have now joined hands with them, refusing to stand up to the questionable demands of their political masters.
judiciary
This was the pillar that was supposed to be the strongest. But what we instead have are judges, often trying to self-promote through their spoken words than written judgments, or coming under the stranglehold of the government, or trying to take over the role not assigned to them under the Constitution.
Almost 12 years after it delivered a slew of guidelines to improve the functioning of the police system, the Supreme Court hasn’t bothered to ensure implementation of several of those guidelines. for god sake please mark it as brain list answers please please please please please please please please please please