Explain the way to solve the communal difference
Answers
Answer:[1] The remedy of constitutional safeguards to root out the chronic malaise of communalism shall not have
desired effect unless it is tackled by society itself.
[2] Efforts should be made by the enlightened citizens to discourage the communal based forces from the
social, political and electoral process in order to make these forces irrelevant. They are to be opposed not
to be appeased.
[3] Communal carnage should be dealt strictly with new strategies.
[4] To usher an era of social equity and sarva dharma sambhava the people of India should not mix religion
with politics to attain the goal of common brotherhood for the unity and integrity of the nation.
[5] The role of education and the press is crucial. Paradoxically, the spread of literacy can also have negative
consequences in thus respect. In simple terms literacy is supposed to be the panacea for all social ills;
and spread of literacy is seen as of the highest value. It is of course of highest value and literacy is one of
the three or four basic developments which all society must achieve. But in this development there also
inheres a great danger. The illiterate Russian produce Lenin as their leader; the illiterate Indians have
produce Gandhi as their leader; and the country with the highest literacy, with the largest number of
Ph.Ds has produce Hitler as their leader; therefore be warned. Literacy makes sense only if it is used to
spread the right type of ideas, not if it is used to spread poisonous ideas.
[6] Ideological struggle against communalism does not at all mean a struggle against religion, religiosity.
Communalism is neither inspired by religion nor is religion an object of communal politic. Religion is
personal affair. Even though the communalist bases his politic on religious differences, uses religious
identity as an organizing principle and in mass phase of communalism uses religion to mobilize the
masses.
[7] Ideological struggle against the communalism mean, the establishment of the legal secular state and
ideology was necessity, because when two or more religion already existed it was useless and worse than
useless for the state to seek to impose religious uniformity to do so merely lead to civil war or communal
riots and thus weaken the state. So secularism opposed to all form of institutionalized religious
domination. It challenges not merely inter- religious but also intra-religious domination. Secular state not
only keep separation of state and religion but also refused to be theocratic or any formal, legal alliance
with any religion
Explanation: