explain the ways to solve communal diffrence.
Answers
Answer:
[1] The remedy of constitutional safeguards to root out the chronic malaise of communalism shall not have desired effect unless it is tackled by society itself.
[2] Efforts should be made by the enlightened citizens to discourage the communal based forces from the social, political and electoral process in order to make these forces irrelevant. They are to be opposed not to be appeased.
[3] Communal carnage should be dealt strictly with new strategies.
[4] To usher an era of social equity and sarva dharma sambhava the people of India should not mix religion with politics to attain the goal of common brotherhood for the unity and integrity of the nation.
[5] The role of education and the press is crucial. Paradoxically, the spread of literacy can also have negative consequences in thus respect. In simple terms literacy is supposed to be the panacea for all social ills; and spread of literacy is seen as of the highest value. It is of course of highest value and literacy is one of the three or four basic developments which all society must achieve. But in this development there also inheres a great danger. The illiterate Russian produce Lenin as their leader; the illiterate Indians have produce Gandhi as their leader; and the country with the highest literacy, with the largest number of Ph.Ds has produce Hitler as their leader; therefore be warned. Literacy makes sense only if it is used to spread the right type of ideas, not if it is used to spread poisonous ideas.
[6] Ideological struggle against communalism does not at all mean a struggle against religion, religiosity. Communalism is neither inspired by religion nor is religion an object of communal politic. Religion is personal affair. Even though the communalist bases his politic on religious differences, uses religious identity as an organizing principle and in mass phase of communalism uses religion to mobilize themasses.
[7] Ideological struggle against the communalism mean, the establishment of the legal secular state and ideology was necessity, because when two or more religion already existed it was useless and worse than useless for the state to seek to impose religious uniformity to do so merely lead to civil war or communal riots and thus weaken the state. So secularism opposed to all form of institutionalized religious domination. It challenges not merely inter- religious but also intra-religious domination. Secular state not only keep separation of state and religion but also refused to be theocratic or any formal, legal alliance with any religion
Explanation: