Explain the ways to solve the communal difference
Answers
Answer:
Communalism is a political philosophy and economic system that integrates communal ownership and confederations of highly localized independent communities. Murray Bookchin, a prominent libertarian socialist, defined the communalism he developed as "a theory of government or a system of government in which independent communes participate in a federation" as well as "the principles and practice of communal ownership". The term government does not imply acceptance of a state or top-down hierarchy.[1][2]
This usage of communalism appears to have emerged during the late 20th century to distinguish commune-based systems from other political movements or governments espousing (if not actually practicing) similar ideas. In particular, earlier communities and movements advocating such practices were often described as "anarchist", "communist" or "socialist".[3]
Explanation:
[1] The remedy of constitutional safeguards to root out the chronic malaise of communalism shall not have
desired effect unless it is tackled by society itself.
[2] Efforts should be made by the enlightened citizens to discourage the communal based forces from the
social, political and electoral process in order to make these forces irrelevant. They are to be opposed not
to be appeased.
[3] Communal carnage should be dealt strictly with new strategies.
[4] To usher an era of social equity and sarva dharma sambhava the people of India should not mix religion
with politics to attain the goal of common brotherhood for the unity and integrity of the nation.
[5] The role of education and the press is crucial. Paradoxically, the spread of literacy can also have negative
consequences in thus respect. In simple terms literacy is supposed to be the panacea for all social ills;
and spread of literacy is seen as of the highest value. It is of course of highest value and literacy is one of
the three or four basic developments which all society must achieve. But in this development there also
inheres a great danger. The illiterate Russian produce Lenin as their leader; the illiterate Indians have
produce Gandhi as their leader; and the country with the highest literacy, with the largest number of
Ph.Ds has produce Hitler as their leader; therefore be warned. Literacy makes sense only if it is used to
spread the right type of ideas, not if it is used to spread poisonous ideas.
[6] Ideological struggle against communalism does not at all mean a struggle against religion, religiosity.