Question

Explain whether decentralization of power is helpful in a democratic state or not .​

Answer 1

Answer:

Decentralization or decentralisation is the process by which the activities of an organization, particularly those regarding planning and decision making, are distributed or delegated away from a central, authoritative location or group.

Concepts of decentralization balls been applied to group dynamics and management science in private businesses and organizations, political science, law and public administration, economics, money and technology.

Explanation:

Decentralisation is the need in India because: 1. India is a vast country, central govt. is unable to hear the needs of people from different areas. ... It helps women to participate in decision making process because 33% seats are reserved for women in local govt.

Decentralization is often linked to concepts of participation in decision-making, democracy, equality and liberty from a higher authority. Decentralization enhances the democratic voice. ... Decentralization brings decision-making back to the sub-national levels".

Answer 2

Answer:

You are hearing today many outstanding analytical and technical presentations about the elements, advantages, and problems with respect to federalism and the decentralization of power. I would like to speak briefly here to some of the broader political and philosophical issues.

As you have heard this morning, a growing number of countries are moving to adopt federal systems that devolve significant governing authority down from the center to lower levels, or at least for decentralizing some significant elements of government responsibility down to local government.There are three broad reasons why so many countries are adopting federal systems, or greater political and administrative decentralization. In some countries, federalism is adopted as a means of giving different ethnic and regional groups some autonomy and control over their own affairs. The thinking is that if different ethnic and regional minorities have some autonomy, some ability to determine their own local affairs with respect to education, culture, and economic development, they will feel more secure, and be more willing to accept the authority and legitimacy of the larger national state. I know there are concerns about this issue in Iraq, and I will return to it in a little while.

Second, federalism or devolution of power is adopted as a means of sharing power among lots of different political parties, which may or may not have some basis in ethnic or regional ties. If democracy is to survive, it cannot be a winner-take-all system, particularly not one in which one party is always going to win, and thus take all. When some governing responsibilities and resources are devolved to lower levels of authority, and when there are a lot of different provinces and municipalities whose governments will be chosen through elections, parties and groups that cannot win control of the central government may win the opportunity to exercise power in some of the lower-level governments This increases their confidence in and commitment to the political system, and the sense among citizens generally that the system is fair and inclusive. If groups with strong bases of support in the country are completely and indefinitely excluded from any share of political power at any level, they are likely to question and even challenge the legitimacy of the system.

Explanation:

Please mark me BRAINLIEST