Explain why “the divine right of kings” clashes with the idea of a social contract.
Answers
Answer:
The idea of “the divine right of kings” clashes heavily with the idea of a social contract because the former allows for a person to rule based only on hereditary succession, whereas the latter says that the people are ultimately in charge of how they are ruled.
Explanation:
here is your answer ☺️.
Answer:
The divine right of kings took away from their citizens whilst the social contract cooperated for benefits.
Explanation: the doctrine that kings derive their authority from God, not from their subjects, from which it follows that rebellion is the worst of political crimes. It was claimed in Britain by the earlier Stuarts and is also associated with the absolutism of Louis XIV of France. (definition of divine right of kings) an implicit agreement among the members of a society to cooperate for social benefits, for example by sacrificing some individual freedom for state protection. Theories of a social contract became popular in the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries among theorists such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, as a means of explaining the origin of government and the obligations of subjects. (definition of social contract)