History, asked by julietlesedi1, 8 months ago

explain why the law of contract has seen so little constitutional transformation (5 Marks)​

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
6

Answer:

In what has to be considered one of the most celebrated judgments that has been delivered by the Supreme Court in recent times, in Navtej Johar v. Union of India, the court held that Transformative Constitutionalism is considered to be one of the objectives of adopting a Constitution itself.

Answered by varsha955769
0

Answer:

The law of contract was came into effect on 25th April, 1872. The law of contract states that the agreement between private parties enforced by law creates a obligation on the mind of parties involved.

Explanation:

Constitution transformation refers to the process of using the set rules for the change in social , economical, geographical, legal factors.

The law of contract has seen so little constitutional transformation:

1) The law of contract is dynamic in nature.

2) The accountability of the laws made and principles to be followed.

3) They are fulfilling the right and decisions of the parties involved.

4) Conflicts: It doesn't leads to any conflicts among the parties.

5) Constitutional transformation comes into action when the right and the views of the parties are declined. Law of contract is derive in very proper manner which avoids transformation.

Similar questions