explanation of case study sharp vs. dawes 1876 in company law
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
The first shareholder sued his colleague claiming that appointment of the liquidator is illegal and should not be valid. ... The court is going to the trial to justify whether the second shareholder was appointed validly as the liquidator of the company in the extraordinary meeting.
Answered by
1
Answer:
The first shareholder sued his colleague claiming that appointment of the liquidator is illegal and should not be valid. ... The court is going to the trial to justify whether the second shareholder was appointed validly as the liquidator of the company in the extraordinary meeting.
please mark me as a brainleist and follow me plz
Similar questions