History, asked by mparmar929, 8 months ago

F
Manoj Parma
August 27, 12:02
Identifies historical and literary sources and describes the use of
reorganization of history.
Answer the following questions.
1. Which are the sources to know history? Give information about any one source.
2. Which is the various historical information that we come to know from ancier
coins?
Explains the development of ancient human civilization and its characteristics.
Do as directed.
Describe the following features of Harappan civilization in two to three sentences.
1. House 2. Roads 3. Public Bath
How can you say that Lothal was a prosperous port of ancient India?
Understands the stages of development during ancient times and compare
development of the two regions. For example-Hunting-Collection. beginning
farming, first city of Indus Valley Civilization.
Answer the following questions.​

Answers

Answered by sethiyanisha97
1

Answer:

Brainlybrainlybrainlybrainlybrainly

Answered by hemishrashmiyya
0

Answer:

In 1989, Leigh Star and Jim Griesemer defined the seminal concept of `boundary objects'. These `objects' are what Latour calls `immutable mobiles' that enable communication and collaboration across difference by helping meaning to be understood in different contexts. As Star notes, they are a sort of arrangement that allow different groups to work together without (a priori) consensus. Part of the idea is to recognize and allow for the `interpretive flexibility' that is central to much of the `constructivist' approach in the sociology of science. Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) can clearly act as boundary objects, but people do not usually assume that they enable interpretive flexibility. After all, they are meant to be unambiguous, machine-interpretable identifiers of defined artifacts. In this paper, we argue that PIDs can fill at least two roles: 1) That of the standardized form, where there is strong agreement on what is being represented and how and 2) that of the idealized type, a more conceptual concept that allows many different representations. We further argue that these seemingly abstract conceptions actually help us implement PIDs more effectively to link data, publications, various other artifacts, and especially people. Considering PIDs as boundary objects can help us address issues such as what level of granularity is necessary for PIDs, what metadata should be directly associated with PIDs, and what purpose is the PID serving (reference, provenance, credit, etc.). In short, sociological theory can improve data sharing standards and their implementation in a way that enables broad interdisciplinary data sharing and reuse. We will illustrate this with several specific examples of Earth science data.

Explanation:

mark me brainliest

Similar questions