Question

five solutions to Electoral Malpractice.

Answer 1

Answer:

Elections ought in theory to go a long way towards making democracy 'work', but in many contexts, they fail to embody democratic ideals because they are affected by electoral manipulation and misconduct. This volume undertakes an analytic and explanatory investigation of electoral malpractice, which is understood as taking three principal forms: manipulation of the rules governing elections, manipulation of vote preference formation and expression, and manipulation of the voting process. The study - which is comparative in nature - starts out by providing a conceptual definition and typology of electoral malpractice, before considering evidence for the causes of this phenomenon. The principal argument of the book is that factors affecting the costs of electoral malpractice are crucial in determining whether leaders will, in any given context, seek to rig elections. Among the most important factors of this sort are the linkages between elites and citizens, and in particular the balance between relations of the civil-society and clientelist types. These linkages play an important role in determining how much legitimacy leaders will lose by engaging in electoral manipulation, as well as the likely consequences of legitimacy loss. The study also shows how electoral malpractice might be reduced by means of a variety of strategies designed to raise the cost of electoral manipulation by increasing the ability of civil society and international actors to monitor and denounce it.

Answer 2

Answer:

The solution of electoral malpractice is Logistics: Timely delivery of election materials, Ensure Card Readers Work, Limiting the utilization of Adhoc/Temporary Staff, Forensic analysis of ballot papers, Setting age restrictions to limit vote buying.

Explanation:

Electoral Malpractices consult with all kinds of illegal and fraudulent activities that interfere with the democratic nature of elections. An election is a component of the democratic process of Nigeria; electorates vote and judge who their next leaders are going to be for a period of $4$ years.

The solutions of Electoral Malpractice are

1. Logistics: Timely delivery of election materialsn: INEC must review its logistical routine. Before and on day, INEC always runs into one problem or the opposite within the timely delivery of essential and sensitive election materials in time – nationwide.
2. Ensure Card Readers Work: The introduction of the electronic voters’ authentication system, aka card reader, to the Nigerian electoral process was to forestall election rigging. Only accredited voters are allowed to vote during elections.
3. Limiting the use of Adhoc/Temporary Staff: It’s no secret that INEC uses lots of temporary or adhoc staff during elections, many of which are NYSC Corp members. This isn’t initially a foul idea for including the youths within the electoral processes, but sometimes it can backfire. a number of these youths might not be adequately trained or have enough practical experience, resulting in mishandling of materials and equipment, which may frustrate the whole process.
4. Forensic analysis of ballot papers: The ballot paper could be a paper slip individuals use to cast their vote on day. After authenticating voters, they use the ballot paper by thumbprinting on the party/candidate they're voting for. And yes, they're the first source of electoral fraud.
5. Setting age restrictions to limit vote buying: Yes, you would possibly think this is often impossible to accomplish but never say never. Educating the masses may or might not yield anything positive due to the sufferable economic conditions they're currently facing.

#SPJ2