Math, asked by kotadsk, 1 day ago

Five tennis stars, Nadal, Federer, Djokovic, Murray and Wawrinka stand in a line in some order and receive cookies and biscuits to eat. No player gets the same number of cookies or biscuits. The person first in the queue gets the least number of cookies. Number of cookies or biscuits received by each student is a natural number from 1 to 9 with each number appearing at least once. The total number of cookies is two more than the total number of biscuits distributed. Djokovic who was in the middle of the line received more goodies (cookies and biscuits put together) than everyone else. Wawrinka receives 8 more cookies than biscuits. The person who is last in the queue received 10 items in all, while Nadal receives only half as many totally. Federer is after Nadal but before Murray in the queue. Number of cookies Federer receives is equal to the number of biscuits Nadal receives. Federer receives one more good than Murray and one less than Djokovic. Person second in the queue receives an odd number of biscuits and an odd number of cookies. Q. Who was 4th in the queue?​

Answers

Answered by sanvisamanta2
0

Answer:

hiii

sorry I didn't see this video

Answered by tapolabdhasaha
0

Answer:

After the French Open final in July, Novak Djokovic, the top-ranked tennis player and the tournament’s top seed, shed tears, but not because he had lost the match to eighth-seeded Stan Wawrinka. He was moved by the crowd at the Roland Garros Stadium in Paris, which gave the Serb a roaring standing ovation during the award ceremony, clapping and whistling for nearly three minutes.

The excellence of the match partly contributed to the prolonged applause, but there was another reason for the crowd going as wild as a tennis audience is capable of going. After the final ball gave Wawrinka the match, Djokovic was the embodiment of spontaneous graciousness as he hugged and congratulated the Swiss.

In his speech, the polyglot Djokovic, speaking in French, said what his body language had earlier made amply clear even on the lifeless television screen: he had the greatest respect for Stan. Wawrinka’s speech, in turn, was full of encomiums for an opponent who had seemed unstoppable all year.

Given the huge expectations from Djokovic, who had come into the tournament with a 28-match winning streak, and his huge desire to win the one Grand Slam that had eluded him, his behaviour deserves praise in proportion to what must have been a massive disappointment

Similar questions