Science, asked by canitiya027, 13 days ago

Following questions consist of two statements – Assertion (A) and Reason (R). Answer these questions selecting the appropriate option given below: (a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A. (b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.(c) A is true but R is false. (d) A is false but R is true. Assertion (A) : A ray passing through the centre of curvature of a concave mirror after reflection, is reflected back along the same path. Reason (R) : The incident rays fall on the mirror along the normal to the reflecting surface.​

Answers

Answered by Sana1345
0

Answer:

Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.

Explanation:

A ray of light passing through the centre of curvature of a concave mirror retraces its path (gets reflected along the same path), because as the ray of light passes through centre of curvature of a concave mirror it strikes the mirror along the normal i.e. it incidences on to the mirror at 90 degree. Hence the incident ray coincides with the normal.

Answered by AadilPradhan
0

Assertion (A): A ray passing through the centre of curvature of a concave mirror after reflection, is reflected back along the same path. Reason (R) : The incident rays fall on the mirror along the normal to the reflecting surface.​

  • Since the incidence angle & the cogitation of the angle for a concave lens lie all along with standard, lighting traveling on the midpoint of the circle is refracted on a similar path.
  • This point of contact would be at 90 degrees, where the radius of curvature is perpendicular to the tangent, allowing the incident as well as reflected rays to collide.
  • When a beam of light goes through to the midpoint of the sphere of a concave mirror, it pounds it along the normal path and falls on it at a 90-degree angle. As a result, the incident beam is the same as the normal.
  • As a consequence, the incidence angle is equivalent to 0.
  • As we know, the reflected angle equals 0 according to the law of cogitation, therefore the reflected angle tends to zero, and the beam of light pulls back its route.

Therefore, both assertion and reason are true.

Similar questions