For a claim about the natural world to be considered scientific, what attributes must it have?
1.It must be based on scientific observations that can be repeated in a controlled setting.
2.It must be consistent with only a small portion of relevant observations or data.
3.It must be open to modification if new evidence doesn't completely support it.
4.It must be applicable to future events and occurrences.
Answers
Answer:
The scientific method is practiced within a context of scientific thinking, and scientific (and critical) thinking is based on three things: using empirical evidence (empiricism), practicing logical reasonsing (rationalism), and possessing a skeptical attitude (skepticism) about presumed knowledge that leads to self- ...
Explanation:
Answer:
For a claim about the natural world to be considered scientific,It must be based on scientific observations which can be repeated in a controlled setting.
Explanation:
Science is the study of nature. This covers both the natural forces operating on and affecting the atoms, plants, animals, people, societies, and galaxies that make up our immediate environment. Science, on the other hand, is not able to explore supernatural forces and explanations.
Scientific studies take place in this well regulated environment that mimics interactions in the real world. Experiments provide for a more controlled environment with a smaller scale where certain variables can be manipulated to determine the outcome. The comprehension of the natural world is aided by experiments.
Therefore the correct answer is option 1. It must be based on scientific observations that can be repeated in a controlled setting.
To know more about "scientific observations "
https://brainly.in/question/4438966
To know more about "natural world"
https://brainly.in/question/7880429?
#SPJ2