Fossil fuels have been a fundamental source of energy since its inception. Which of the following is not an argument for why we should change fuel sources? supplies are running out sustainable fuel sources are more reliable 24/7 balance of trade
Answers
Explanation:
Production of these fossil fuels is expected to rise, approximately doubling the amount of use of each fossil fuel. As world population continues to grow and the limited amount of fossil fuels begin to diminish, it may not be possible to provide the amount of energy demanded by the world by only using fossil fuels to convert energy. There are plenty of ways to convert energy without fossil fuels, and many of are being used, but not nearly to their full potential. Countries must take action to promote a greater use of renewable energy resources, such as geothermal energy or nuclear power, so that we can be well prepared when the supplies of fossil fuels are not as plentiful as they seem today.
The fairly low cost of converting natural resources to energy causes most countries to use fossil fuels as their main source of energy, but there is a major problem that arises out of this: natural resources are limited and non-renewable. There is only so much oil, coal, and natural gas that the earth can hold, and we can not use these resources as if there is an unlimited amount for much longer. Some estimates say that there may only be as few as 20 years of oil left if the world keeps with the increasing consumption trend before oil prices sharply increase resulting in a possible international economic crisis (EIA). Prices would go up because of the simple economic model of supply and demand. There has been an increasing demand for fossil fuels in the past thirty years, and this can be seen by the growing trend of energy produced by all three of the fossil fuels.
hope helped you
❤❤❤
plz plz plz mark my answer as brainlyliest