Political Science, asked by mritunjoy2488, 10 months ago

From the information that many amendments were made during 2000-2003, which of the following conclusions would you draw? a. Judiciary did not interfere in the amendments made during this period. b. One political party had a strong majority during this period. c. There was stron d. There were no real differences among the parties during this time. e. The amendments were of a non-controversial nature and parties had an agreement on the subject of amendments.

Answers

Answered by Shaizakincsem
0

It is as follow..

Explanation:

I would take the following conclusions for the amendments.

C) There was strong pressure from the pubic in favor of certain amendments.  

D) There were no real differences among the parties during this time.  

E) The amendments were of a non-controversial nature and parties had an agreement on the subject of amendments.  

They are perfect for the amendments that can make during the 2000-2003 era.  

The reason is that in this era the government was under the control of  Dr. Manmohan Signh.  

He took a lot of steps to make it better and superior.

Similar questions
Math, 5 months ago