functions of human beings ?
Answers
Answered by
2
The function of a human being is to be good at acting in accordance with reason. In other words to be good at (or do well at) rational activities makes human beings happy, signifying that they have achieved their peculiar function, according to Aristotle.
Presumably, however, to say that happiness is the chief good seems a platitude, and a clearer account of what it is still desired. This might perhaps be given, if we could first ascertain THE FUNCTION of man.
For just as for a flute-player, a sculptor, or an artist, and, in general, for all things that have a FUNCTION or activity, the good and the 'well' is thought to reside in the FUNCTION, so would it seem to be for man, if he has a function. Have the carpenter, then, and the tanner certain functions or activities, and has man none? Is he born without a function?
Or as eye, hand, foot, and in general each of the parts evidently has a function, may one lay it down that man similarly has a FUNCTION apart from all these? What then can this be?
Life seems to be common even to plants, but we are seeking what is peculiar to man. Let us exclude, therefore, the life of nutrition and growth. Next there would be a life of perception, but it also seems to be common even to the horse, the ox, and every animal.
There remains, then, an ACTIVE LIFE of the element that has a RATIONAL PRINCIPLE; of this, one part has such a principle in the sense of being obedient to one, the other in the sense of possessing one and exercising thought.
And, as 'life of the rational element' also has two meanings, we must state that life in the sense of activity is what we mean; for this seems to be the more proper sense of the term. Now if the function of man is an activity of soul which follows or implies a rational principle, and if we say 'so-and-so-and 'a good so-and-so' have a function which is the same in kind, e.g. a lyre, and a good lyre-player, and so without qualification in all cases, eminence in respect of goodness being idded to the name of the function (for the function of a lyre-player is to play the lyre, and that of a good lyre-player is to do so well): if this is the case, and we state the function of man to be a certain kind of life, and this to be an activity or actions of the soul implying a RATIONAL PRINCIPLE, and the function of a good man to be the GOOD and NOBLE performance of these, and if any action is well performed when it is performed in accordance with the appropriate excellence: if this is the case, human good turns out to be activity of soul in accordance with VIRTUE, and if there are more than one VIRTUE, in accordance with the best and most complete.
Presumably, however, to say that happiness is the chief good seems a platitude, and a clearer account of what it is still desired. This might perhaps be given, if we could first ascertain THE FUNCTION of man.
For just as for a flute-player, a sculptor, or an artist, and, in general, for all things that have a FUNCTION or activity, the good and the 'well' is thought to reside in the FUNCTION, so would it seem to be for man, if he has a function. Have the carpenter, then, and the tanner certain functions or activities, and has man none? Is he born without a function?
Or as eye, hand, foot, and in general each of the parts evidently has a function, may one lay it down that man similarly has a FUNCTION apart from all these? What then can this be?
Life seems to be common even to plants, but we are seeking what is peculiar to man. Let us exclude, therefore, the life of nutrition and growth. Next there would be a life of perception, but it also seems to be common even to the horse, the ox, and every animal.
There remains, then, an ACTIVE LIFE of the element that has a RATIONAL PRINCIPLE; of this, one part has such a principle in the sense of being obedient to one, the other in the sense of possessing one and exercising thought.
And, as 'life of the rational element' also has two meanings, we must state that life in the sense of activity is what we mean; for this seems to be the more proper sense of the term. Now if the function of man is an activity of soul which follows or implies a rational principle, and if we say 'so-and-so-and 'a good so-and-so' have a function which is the same in kind, e.g. a lyre, and a good lyre-player, and so without qualification in all cases, eminence in respect of goodness being idded to the name of the function (for the function of a lyre-player is to play the lyre, and that of a good lyre-player is to do so well): if this is the case, and we state the function of man to be a certain kind of life, and this to be an activity or actions of the soul implying a RATIONAL PRINCIPLE, and the function of a good man to be the GOOD and NOBLE performance of these, and if any action is well performed when it is performed in accordance with the appropriate excellence: if this is the case, human good turns out to be activity of soul in accordance with VIRTUE, and if there are more than one VIRTUE, in accordance with the best and most complete.
Answered by
1
The basic processes of life include organization, metabolism, responsiveness, movements, and reproduction. In humans, who represent the most complex form of life, there are additional requirements such as growth, differentiation, respiration, digestion, and excretion. All of these processes are interrelated.
Hope it will helps ✌
Answered by
2
The basic processes of life include organization, metabolism, responsiveness, movements, and reproduction. In humans, who represent the most complex form of life, there are additional requirements such as growth, differentiation, respiration, digestion, and excretion. All of these processes are interrelated.
Hope it will helps ✌
Similar questions