Question

Gandhiji vs Subhash Chandra Bose

Who do you think have brought India freedom fast (If Subhash was alive )

and made India powerful with no black politics

Answers like Both are equal , Both may have done the same thing are not allowed ! ​

Answer 1

HEY MATE!!!

FOR YOUR FIRST QUESTION,ACCORDING TO ME GANDHIJI WOULD HAVE BROUGHT INDIA FREEDOM MORE FAST BECAUSE FIRST OF ALL,BECAUSE OF HIM ONLY THE PEOPLE OF INDIA BECAME UNITED.

HE BROKE THE DIVIDE AND RULE POLICY OF BRITISHERS,AND ALSO GAVE INSTANT ANSWERS TO PEOPLE'S QUESTIONS IN LETTERS.

I WOULD NEVER SAY THAT SUBHASH CHANDRABOSE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING.

HE WAS A TRUE HERO.

I HOPE THIS ANSWER HELPED YOU...☺️

Answer 2

▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬

$\mathfrak{The\:Answer\:is}$

Now that's a question to be asked.

We all now about the rift between Subhash Chandra Bose and Mahatma Gandhi.

Subhash Chandra Bose wanted to achieve independence through means of arms and war.

While, Gandhiji wanted to achieve independence through means of peace and no armed revolution.

Both were superior in their means.

* If we take a look at foreign history, then the top countries today, had achieved independence through armed revolution. They fought with the colonisers and acheived independence. The best example is AMERICA. It is now the biggest superpower.

It is stated clearly - We all value the thing acheived by Hard Work.

So, India would have prospered way more if it would have gained independence under the guidance of Subhash Chandra Bose.

Whereas, India acheived Independence under Gandhi and this independence is not hard earned. It is likely to be granted to us by the Britishers. So we keep on misusing it.

If It would have been hard-earned by fight and war, then we would have understood it's value.

SO, in my motive, India would have acheived a better independence under the guidance of SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE.

$\boxed{Hope\:This\:Helps}$

▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬