gave much
Translate the given passage.
India, as a nation, never gave
importance to the habit of accumulating
things of material value. Instead it
has always valued the qualities that
inherent to a human being. Characteris-
tics like greed, desire and anger are
present in every individual but to
consider these qualities as the main
source of energy and to give in to them
gives rise to bad behavior.
Answers
Adam Smith is often identified as the father of modern capitalism. While accurate to some extent, this description is both overly simplistic and dangerously misleading. On the one hand, it is true that very few individual books have had as much impact as his An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. His accounts of the division of labor and free trade, self-interest in exchange, the limits on government intervention, price, and the general structure of the market, all signify the moment when economics transitions to the “modern.” On the other hand, The Wealth of Nations, as it is most often called, is not a book on economics. Its subject is “political economy,” a much more expansive mixture of philosophy, political science, history, economics, anthropology, and sociology. The role of the free market and the laissez-faire structures that support it are but two components of a larger theory of human interaction and social history.
Smith was not an economist; he was a philosopher. His first book, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, sought to describe the natural principles that govern morality and the ways in which human beings come to know them. How these two books fit together is both one of the most controversial subjects in Smith scholarship and the key to understanding his arguments about the market and human activity in general. Historically, this process is made more difficult by the so-called “Adam Smith Problem,” a position put forth by small numbers of committed scholars since the late nineteenth century that Smith’s two books are incompatible. The argument suggests that Smith’s work on ethics, which supposedly assumed altruistic human motivation, contradicts his political economy, which allegedly assumed egoism. However, most contemporary Smith scholars reject this claim as well as the description of Smith’s account of human motivation it presupposes.
Smith never uses the term “capitalism;” it does not enter into widespread use until the late nineteenth century. Instead, he uses “commercial society,” a phrase that emphasizes his belief that the economic is only one component of the human condition. And while, for Smith, a nation’s economic “stage” helps define its social and political structures, he is also clear that the moral character of a people is the ultimate measure of their humanity. To investigate Smith’s work, therefore, is to ask many of the great questions that we all struggle with today, including those that emphasize the relationship of morality and economics. Smith asks why individuals should be moral. He offers models for how people should treat themselves and others. He argues that scientific method can lead to moral discovery, and he presents a blueprint for a just society that concerns itself with its least well-off members, not just those with economic success. Adam Smith’s philosophy bears little resemblance to the libertarian caricature put forth by proponents of laissez faire markets who describe humans solely as homo economicus. For Smith, the market is a mechanism of morality and social support.
Required Answer :
Hindi :
भारत, एक राष्ट्र के रूप में, कभी नहीं दिया
संचय की आदत को महत्व
भौतिक मूल्य की बातें। इसके बजाय
हमेशा उन गुणों को महत्व दिया है जो
एक इंसान के लिए निहित है।
लालच, इच्छा और क्रोध जैसे tics हैं
हर व्यक्ति में मौजूद है लेकिन
इन गुणों को मुख्य मानें
ऊर्जा का स्रोत और उन्हें देने के लिए
बुरे व्यवहार को जन्म देता है।
Urdu:
ہندوستان ، ایک ملک کے طور پر ، کبھی نہیں دیا
سجاوٹ کی قدر
جسمانی قیمت کی باتیں۔ اس کے بجائے
ہمیشہ ان کی خصوصیات میں سے ایک ہے
ایک انجن کی نشاندہی کی جارہی ہے۔ کیریکٹریس-
لالچ ، کروڈ اور کروڈ کی طرح کی حکمت عملی ہیں
ہر شخص میں رہتا ہے
اس کی خصوصیات میں مرکزی مائیں
توانائی کا ماخذ اور ان کی توجہ دلانا
بد عملی
Tamil :
இந்தியா, ஒரு நாடாக, ஒருபோதும் கைவிடவில்லை
அலங்காரத்தின் மதிப்பு
உடல் மதிப்பு பற்றிய பேச்சு. மாறாக
எப்போதும் அவற்றின் அம்சங்களில் ஒன்று
ஒரு இயந்திரம் அடையாளம் காணப்படுகிறது. எழுத்து-
பேராசை, பேராசை, பேராசை போன்ற உத்திகள் உள்ளன
எல்லோரிடமும் வாழ்கிறார்
அதன் அம்சங்களில் மத்திய தாய்மார்கள்
ஆற்றலின் ஆதாரம் மற்றும் அவர்களின் கவனத்தை ஈர்க்கிறது
தவறான பயிற்சி.
Telugu:
భారతదేశం, ఒక దేశంగా, ఎప్పుడూ వదిలిపెట్టలేదు
డెకర్ యొక్క విలువ
భౌతిక విలువ గురించి మాట్లాడండి. బదులుగా
ఎల్లప్పుడూ వారి లక్షణాలలో ఒకటి
ఒక యంత్రం గుర్తించబడింది. లేఖ-
దురాశ, దురాశ, దురాశ వంటి వ్యూహాలు ఉన్నాయి
అందరికీ నివసిస్తుంది
దాని లక్షణాలలో కేంద్ర తల్లులు
శక్తి యొక్క మూలం మరియు వారి దృష్టిని ఆకర్షిస్తుంది
సరికాని శిక్షణ
Malayalam:
ഒരു രാജ്യമെന്ന നിലയിൽ ഇന്ത്യ ഒരിക്കലും കൈവിട്ടില്ല
അലങ്കാരത്തിന്റെ മൂല്യം
ഭൗതിക മൂല്യത്തെക്കുറിച്ച് സംസാരിക്കുക. പകരം
എല്ലായ്പ്പോഴും അവരുടെ സവിശേഷതകളിൽ ഒന്ന്
ഒരു യന്ത്രം കണ്ടെത്തി. കത്ത്-
അത്യാഗ്രഹം, അത്യാഗ്രഹം, അത്യാഗ്രഹം തുടങ്ങിയ തന്ത്രങ്ങളുണ്ട്
എല്ലാവരും ജീവിക്കുന്നു
കേന്ദ്ര അമ്മമാർ അതിന്റെ സവിശേഷതകളിൽ
Energy ർജ്ജത്തിന്റെ ഉറവിടവും അവരുടെ ശ്രദ്ധ ആകർഷിക്കുന്നു
അനുചിതമായ പരിശീലനം