Question

getting a job in factories was always difficult in the 19th Century justify the statement comparing the case of England and India​

Answer 1

Answer:

(i) England: The actual possibility of getting a job depended on existing network of friendship and kin relationship. A person was more likely to get a job if he had a friend or a relative working in the factory. Many who did not have connections had to wait for weeks spending nights under bridges or in the night shelters.

(ii) India: In India, the number of job seekers was always more than the jobs available. Industrialists usually employed jobbers, who usually were old and trusted workers to get new recruits. The jobber got people from his village, ensured them a job and helped them settle in the city. jobbers eventually began demanding money for the favors they showed and controlled the lives of workers.

HOPE IT IS HELPFUL........

PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST............

Answer 2

$\Large{\textbf{\underline{\underline{Following\:points\:are:-}}}}$

$\textbf{\underline{India:-}}$

It was founded that in the 19th century the no of jobs were less as comparison to job seekers hence many job seekers faced unemployment. Also the person who worked in the industry as for long time they were treated as trusted people hence the recruitment process was taken by trusted people. The trusted workers take money to give employment in industries. Hence many people still face the unemployment due to poverty.

$\textbf{\underline{England:-}}$

In the 19th century the dependency of getting job is totally depends upon the friendship. The person who were working in existing factory they can recommend any relatives to get job. As in response many workers who don't have any relationship with the factory employ they suffered from unemployment.