Give a critical evaluation for the breaking of the unity of hindu and muslim for the partition of Bengal. It's a research question. Please help
Answers
Answer:
main battlefield. While secularists invoke the Indian tradition of toleration thus pleading for a multicultural India, communalists point to the long experience of religious strife and conclude the necessity of territorial demarcation. Some post-colonial critics even view the very reliance on history as the basic problem. The frequent instances of violence against minorities in connection with disputes over the past give cause to reconsider the role of history in the emergence of the nation state in India. Those obsessed with origin in their idea of the nation assume no perspective of change that would allow heterogeneous elements to merge. Secularists often bring into play only a singular, particular perspective, in which other possible perspectives are neglected. By inserting both the unifying model of the nation state and the diversity of cultural and social forms of life into an overarching perspective of temporal change, a modern form of unity can be accomplished that may be called unity in diversity
PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIST ANSWERS PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE REQUESTING
when the division of Pakistan occur it was done by religious beliefs so the nam of bangla dash was also Pakistan. Then the muslim of bengal started to fight for partition .So by this it brake the unity.
2nd reason:
When bengal partition happen the both community was living together but by partition they separated it damage the unity of both.
Explanation:
if u like make as brainlist