Give a Debate on 'Utility of entrance test for undergoing Courses'
Answers
I agree that entrance exam should be abolished I could catch hold of so many students giving up their life in newspapers just because of an unsuccessful attempt in the exam not only that they think that they stand nowhere in this competitive world but also start loosing their self efficacy and it seems like that just an entrance exam decide their lifel
. Negative or Against pointers
Important to get admission I strongly believe that entrance exams are not at all a burden as it is very important to get admission in a top school or university. If we have to get admission, we have to word hard. We should get admission on the basis of our ability not on the basis of our family status or wealth . positive side or for side.
My point of view
I agree and disagree. This what I want the cycle of Universities to be. Taking the exam is a MUST but first of all, Even if you have failed in the exam, There should still be a way (through Oral Exam or something else alternatively) that is promising to the students applying to their universities. Then we can go to the 2nd step which is "division" by class (without hierarchy of course), We will be adapting students to their most needs whichever subjects they may fail to. Rejecting students just makes them discouraged and move on to another until they give up in life, Which is very difficult (specially for those who work hard for it, But didn't get it) and for those who didn't work hard or plainly just enough effort (prodigies or natural talents) but got it without a hitch.
We must really take a strict but forgiving proposition for our future successors, Making it more hard for other people makes it more hard for our government/country to unite as one.
That's why I propose it to be a substantial cycle that makes it for righteous.
hope it helps ya