Question

give any three reasonsthat decentralisation would solve the conflicts between the union and the state government​

Answer 1

Answer:

As we have seen, however, there remains a lack of agreement amongst academics, practitioners and ordinary citizens regarding the efficacy of decentralization as a tool for conflict resolution. Despite the increased use of decentralization as an instrument for managing conflict, as well as the small literary industry which has emerged around the topic, the debate remains inconclusive. In short, there is still no clear answer to why decentralization works in some places but not in others. Often, other factors not directly linked to decentralization explain the failure of certain agreements, such as the influence of external actors, resource distribution or the existence of spoiling parties who were not included in peace agreements (Erk and Anderson, 2010; McGarry and O’Leary, 2009; Wolff, 2011). Yet, while empirical evidence seems to suggest that decentralization is able to rebuild and transform previously war-torn societies (Hartzell and Hoddie, 2007; O’Leary, 2013), it is obvious that it is no panacea and cannot address all issues. As the world becomes increasingly diverse, democratic states are faced with the herculean task of accommodating the array of different, and at times conflicting, ethnic, cultural, religious and linguistic interests of distinct minority groups. As we have seen, decentralization is not equipped to eradicate all tensions nor satisfy or accommodate all groups, but it appears, at least in the short term, the most intuitive response in managing the intractable challenge of growing ethnocultural diversity

hope it helps you