Question

Give arguments to support or oppose the following assertions:
A. Industrialised countries can afford democracy but the poor countries need dictatorship to become rich.
B. Democracy can’t reduce inequality of incomes between different citizens.
C. Government in poor countries should spend less on poverty reduction, health, education and spend more on industries and infrastructure.
D. In democracy all citizens have one vote, which means that there is the absence of any domination and conflict.​

Answer 1

$\huge\texttt{ANSWER:-}}$

A. Industrialized countries can afford democracy but the poor countries need a dictatorship to become rich.
This is an incorrect statement. It is true that the economic growth rate in poor countries under a dictatorship is higher than when ruled under democracy. Yet, we cannot deny the fact that respect and dignity of every person are extremely important. So, poor countries must be allowed to function under a democratic system.

B. Democracy can’t reduce inequality of incomes between different citizens.
This is an incorrect statement. Democracy States equality for all. Everyone has an equal set of rights. However the rich enjoy a disproportionate share of income. The rich are becoming richer and the poor are becoming poorer.

C. The government in poor countries should spend less on poverty reduction, health, education and spend more on industries and infrastructure.
This statement is incorrect. Income, health, and education are the basic need of every citizen. It is the responsibility of the government to provide adequate and equal access to this everyone. They must prioritize these structures as compared to expenditure on industries and infrastructure.

D. In a democracy, all citizens have one vote, which means that there is the absence of any domination and conflict.
This is an incorrect statement. Every person has only one vote and the people are divided on various grounds. Such kind of division leads to domination and conflict.

Answer 2

Answer:Industrialisation countries can afford democracy but poor countries need dictatorship to become rich..

This statement is incorrect. Though it is mostly seen that counties under dictatorship has higher economic rates than those under democracy. But the decisions made in democracy are more effective and moreover people can change the decision if made wrong but in dictatorship citizen don't have that dignity and rights even if the economic rates are little slow democracy is more preferable.

Democracy can't reduce inequality of income between different citizens

I think so that the statement is correct because in democracy it seems to have good Policies but when comes in practical it doesn't give that efficiency . In democracy people who are rich are getting more rich and rich but the poor people are getting poor due to in proportional share of income.

Explanation: