Political Science, asked by Abhishekpandey8251, 11 months ago

Give one difference between united progressive alliance and national democratic alliance

Answers

Answered by vivekchowdary2006
21

NDA is a group of other parties headed by BJP who has clear majority in Parliament. NDA came to Power in 2014.

UPA is group of Parties headed by Congress who have only 44 MPs in the Lok Sabha. As per Rules since their No is less that 10% of the total seats they cannot be termed as Main Opposition party and have it’s MP as the leader of Opposition. Their MP is now the leader of Opposition but I am not sure how, why and under what circumstances that post was conferred on him.There have been two versions of UPA 1 and UPA 2. They ruled the country for 10 years under Dr Manmohan Singh as the PM. During this 10 years, Lalu Prasad Yadav’s party RJD was one of the allies of UPA 1 and UPA 2. He enjoyed Cabinet position while fodder scam case was pending trial against him in the Court of Law. The charges against him were of corruption and misappropriation of Public Funds etc. He has been now convicted in two cases out of 6 and is presently lodged in Jail. The case against him was pending for framing of charges for about 25 years. Framing of charges means the court frames charges against the accused based on the evidence available on record. The accused is asked if he pleads guilty and if he pleads not guilty the charges are framed. This is the stage when the trial commences. Till then the case pending is called Court proceedings. It is by and large common for a case pending trial for few years. But pending for framing charges for 25 years is shocking and surprising. This cannot happen in a normal case. So readers have to read between the lines. The trial ended in logical conclusion only after NDA came to Power.

It is on record that there were 54 scams during Congress regimes from 1947 till 2014. And NDA has the first PNB Scam. What a track record.

This is the difference between NDA and UPA.

Answered by shukladivyansh073
11

Answer:

UPA is a group of Parties headed by Congress that has only 44 MPs in the Lok Sabha. As per Rules since their No is less than 10% of the total seats they cannot be termed as Main Opposition party and have its MP as the leader of Opposition. Their MP is now the leader of Opposition but I am not sure how, why, and under what circumstances that post was conferred on him. There have been two versions of UPA 1 and UPA 2. They ruled the country for 10 years under Dr. Manmohan Singh as the PM. During these 10 years, Lalu Prasad Yadav’s party RJD was one of the allies of UPA 1 and UPA 2. He enjoyed the Cabinet position while the fodder scam case was a pending trial against him in the Court of Law. The charges against him were of corruption and misappropriation of Public Funds etc. He has been now convicted in two cases out of 6 and is presently lodged in Jail. The case against him was pending for framing of charges for about 25 years. Framing of charges means the court frames charges against the accused based on the evidence available on record. The accused is asked if he pleads guilty and if he pleads not guilty the charges are framed. This is the stage when the trial commences. Till then the case pending is called Court proceedings. It is by and large common for a case pending trial for a few years. But pending framing charges for 25 years is shocking. This cannot happen in a normal case. So readers have to read between the lines. The trial ended in a logical conclusion only after NDA came to power.

Similar questions