English, asked by aryanjaiswal9390, 8 months ago

give one example in that luxury are useless while the basic needs is all that matters during this pandemic​

Answers

Answered by suhanigovind15
0

Answer:While we’re all mandated to stay at home, and many individuals are also suffering financially due to pay cuts and loss of jobs, it might seem frivolous to buy clothes, candles or cakes at a time like this, but some may find solace in the treat.

“I think it’s important that we avoid, as far as possible, moralistic judgements of others’ choices,” says Fraser. “One person’s luxury item might be key to another’s mental health.”

So, rather than worrying about whether or not we should be buying “unnecessary” items in a pandemic, we should be taking collective action, Fraser adds.

“The best thing individuals can do is put pressure on their governments to allocate resources compassionately rather than agonise over their own, or over others’, consumer choices.”

On Sunday, the UAE announced it had increased its economic stimulus package to Dh256 billion ($70bn) to mitigate the impact of the coronavirus outbreak on the country's businesses and residents.

We still can remain aware that by undertaking too many orders we may clog up the infrastructure for those in need, particularly when it comes to “essentials”, such as groceries and medical supplies.

“The government advice in the UK is that we should be using delivery services wherever necessary, and not only in cases where one is ill or disabled,” Fraser continues. “The main problem with this advice is that deliveries are a scarce resource: if everyone tries to get their food delivered, there are fewer slots available for the most vulnerable.”

mark as brainliest

Answered by bkpaf253
0

Answer:

Answer:While we’re all mandated to stay at home, and many individuals are also suffering financially due to pay cuts and loss of jobs, it might seem frivolous to buy clothes, candles or cakes at a time like this, but some may find solace in the treat.

“I think it’s important that we avoid, as far as possible, moralistic judgements of others’ choices,” says Fraser. “One person’s luxury item might be key to another’s mental health.”

So, rather than worrying about whether or not we should be buying “unnecessary” items in a pandemic, we should be taking collective action, Fraser adds.

“The best thing individuals can do is put pressure on their governments to allocate resources compassionately rather than agonise over their own, or over others’, consumer choices.”

On Sunday, the UAE announced it had increased its economic stimulus package to Dh256 billion ($70bn) to mitigate the impact of the coronavirus outbreak on the country's businesses and residents.

We still can remain aware that by undertaking too many orders we may clog up the infrastructure for those in need, particularly when it comes to “essentials”, such as groceries and medical supplies.

“The government advice in the UK is that we should be using delivery services wherever necessary, and not only in cases where one is ill or disabled,” Fraser continues. “The main problem with this advice is that deliveries are a scarce resource: if everyone tries to get their food delivered, there are fewer slots available for the most vulnerable.”

hope it help u. plz plz plz mark me as the brainiest.

Similar questions