give reason.............
Attachments:
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
no,l is not parallel
Step-by-step explanation:
because 180-105=75
but if lines would be parallel then it should be 50 because of the corresponding angles
Answered by
0
➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡
No, l is not parallel to m .
➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡➡
Similar questions