give reasons
why was slave dynasty called so ?
the deccan policy of aurrangzeb was a failure.why
the work of erosion and transportation is more in the mountains than in the plains.give reasons.
Answers
Answered by
1
your first question answer is
The dynasty found by Qutub-din-aibak, a slave of Muhammad Ghori, is known as slave dynasty. However its a misnomer. Out of all the sultans, only three, viz, Qutub-din Aibak, Iltutmish and Ghiyas-ud-din balban were slave sand even they were manumitted by their masters.
Also its neither a pathan dynasty nor an afgan dynasty but a turkish dynasty
2nd answer is
the Auranzeb’s policy in the Deccan as wrongly devised and the Mughal Empire ultimately had to pay for it. Passing such judgment would be historically incorrect. In view of the prevailing situation in the Deccan, specifically the rise of the Marathas on the one hand and the existing enmity and-distrust among the Deccan states on the other, made the Mughal intervention in the Deccan inevitable. If we look closely at different phases of the Mughal policy in Deccan, it seems clear that the Mughal rulers certainly considered the contemporary situation before taking any step towards the Deccan states. Different factors guided their attitude towards the Deccan states. Their occasional failure in the Deccan was not only because of their lack of understanding the Deccan problem but the factional fightings of the Mughal nobles as well as their questionable loyalty was equally responsible for the debacle in the Deccan affairs. So one should look at the Deccan policy of the Aurangzeb from a broader perspective, instead of narrowing down on any single factor.
Initially Aurangzeb did not want to annex Bijapur and Golkonda, but ultimately both the states were annexed to the Mughal empire. This annexation did not bring the Deccan problem to an end, rather by the end of the 17th and the beginning of the 18th century the crisis again cropped up in the Deccan and the major threat to the empire came from the Marathas.
3rd answer is
The work of erosion and transportation of a river is more in the mountains than in the plains because when the water flows in the slopes of the mountains , it is in its 1st course which means that it flows very fast, depositing and eroding all that it can. But when it flows through plains , it is in its 3rd course which means that the flow is very slow which makes it a bit difficult for the water to deposit or erode the substances.
The dynasty found by Qutub-din-aibak, a slave of Muhammad Ghori, is known as slave dynasty. However its a misnomer. Out of all the sultans, only three, viz, Qutub-din Aibak, Iltutmish and Ghiyas-ud-din balban were slave sand even they were manumitted by their masters.
Also its neither a pathan dynasty nor an afgan dynasty but a turkish dynasty
2nd answer is
the Auranzeb’s policy in the Deccan as wrongly devised and the Mughal Empire ultimately had to pay for it. Passing such judgment would be historically incorrect. In view of the prevailing situation in the Deccan, specifically the rise of the Marathas on the one hand and the existing enmity and-distrust among the Deccan states on the other, made the Mughal intervention in the Deccan inevitable. If we look closely at different phases of the Mughal policy in Deccan, it seems clear that the Mughal rulers certainly considered the contemporary situation before taking any step towards the Deccan states. Different factors guided their attitude towards the Deccan states. Their occasional failure in the Deccan was not only because of their lack of understanding the Deccan problem but the factional fightings of the Mughal nobles as well as their questionable loyalty was equally responsible for the debacle in the Deccan affairs. So one should look at the Deccan policy of the Aurangzeb from a broader perspective, instead of narrowing down on any single factor.
Initially Aurangzeb did not want to annex Bijapur and Golkonda, but ultimately both the states were annexed to the Mughal empire. This annexation did not bring the Deccan problem to an end, rather by the end of the 17th and the beginning of the 18th century the crisis again cropped up in the Deccan and the major threat to the empire came from the Marathas.
3rd answer is
The work of erosion and transportation of a river is more in the mountains than in the plains because when the water flows in the slopes of the mountains , it is in its 1st course which means that it flows very fast, depositing and eroding all that it can. But when it flows through plains , it is in its 3rd course which means that the flow is very slow which makes it a bit difficult for the water to deposit or erode the substances.
Pranjal7860603833:
have u got answers
I think this will help you out
Answered by
0
Mamluk dynasty (Delhi) (also called Slave Dynastyor gulham dynasty ) was a dynasty established in Northern India by Qutb ud-Din Aibak. He was a turkic slave of Muhammad of Ghor. The Mamluk Dynasty ruled North India from 1206 to 1290. It was the first of five dynasties of the Delhi Sultanate, which lasted until 1526.
Similar questions