English, asked by deepa881, 1 month ago

give some points about why we avoid to
cutting the trees​

Answers

Answered by brundag
0

Answer:

However, it usually encroaches on pure and valuable habitat, like that of the Southern old-growth bayou woods, the last of which was cut down in spite of the fact of extensive studies that that would make the Ivory-bilked Woodpecker go extinct, which was an example of the broad view that it was the last landscape of its kind, where rare gray foxes and panthers also survived after relentless persecution elsewhere.

Logging paths also intrude upon woods by tamping down soil and introducing trace amounts of miscellaneous pollutants. Expansive forests are rare. Crisscrossing a forest can open it up to diseases, eliminate already-rare species that depend on pure forest (not patchwork), and allow brown-headed cowbirds and other species of the disproportionate amount of in-between habitat to parasitize woodland birds.

Back in the day deforestation meant virgin, magically valuable cathedrals were felled and converted into ugly human development. But now that all virgin forest has been cut, there’s les backlash from environmentalists. Most woodland today is poisoned by invasive species, like hundreds of earthworms per square meter, and European wasteland weeds, 4 pH rain, erosion from overuse, elimination of undergrowth and certain palatable species by deer (wolves being exterminated in most areas, Eastern cougars being wholly extinct, decline or extermination of other predators). It is settlement after apocalypse. The most common species like American Elm and American Chestnut have gone extinct. The most common woodland animal of America, the Passenger Pigeon, has gone extinct. Not to mention species like the Carolina Parakeet (yes, North America had parrots). Nowadays invasive species of many species are extremely prevalent. Most woodland is just regrown farmland, post-deforestation of the virgin forest that was protested.

The alternatives to forest often have even more invasive species. I don’t think there’s an example of virgin grassland or wetland anywhere. The “grassland” we have are often completely degraded. Invasive include lawn grass, and accompanying Eurasian weeds. Reclaimed lawn is on soil literally poisoned with years’ worth of herbicides whose purpose was to stop those very plants from growing. “It’s just dirt” is an outdated aphorism; the robins pulling worms from your yard are constantly ingesting herbicide. No wonder lawns are so barren. No wonder robins live for only one or two years. You can let wildlife eat from your lawn, but you can’t let your pets eat from it. Because it’s a poison minefield. What about children playing in your lawn? Tests have indeed found significant levels of lawn toxins in childrens’ bodies. No big deal. After all, your cities’ sewers empty into the lakes, and people swim in them.

Some people are so used to seeing degraded, post-apocalyptic grassland that they introduce invasives that they commonly see in it, into relatively virgin grassland. E.g., on NY, black-eyes susan, teasle and Queen Anne’s lace. I grimace every time I see a plaque of some clueless college students planting them (releasing bioweaponry) in the grassland of a nature “refuge”.

In the 20th century they no longer had grassland birds, they had farmland birds. Now in the 21st we don’t even have farmland birds, generally speaking, in NY. There is now VERY LITTLE or just about no grassland in the US. The Trump Administraton alone is probably going finish them off, as well as America’s last wilderness (naturally only in simple snowy landscape of northern Alaska). In 2020 I will be saying in my answers that there is NO true grassland left in America, that the US has finished off the LAST of its wilderness, and North America is officially. anthropogenic dystopia. Another tick after Europe.

But now people don’t recognize we live in a dystopian. The present is the new normal. Lawn grass is “nature”.

People take walks in their suburban complexes to experience nature. The only nature there is the blue of the sky.

National parks are complete rip-offs. They’re tourist museums. I think they should be abolished and instead be nameless protected land.

- Brunda G

Answered by sg1530456075
0

Answer:

• Because the tree is very important for human being to oxygen

•tree that make our world beautiful

•there is no tree in world then human are not provide oxygen then human are going to be dead

please make it breanly

Similar questions