History, asked by rajkumarguptaac, 5 months ago

give the following answer if answers will be correct I will mark you as brainliest

is Aurangzeb was a good ruler or bad ruler give reasons

is Akbar was a good ruler or bad ruler give reasons

is Jahangir was a good ruler or bad ruler give reasons

is Shah Jahan was a good ruler or bad ruler give reasons

is Babur was a good ruler or bad ruler give reasons

is Humayun was a good ruler or bad ruler give reasons ​

Answers

Answered by diajain01
33

ANSWER ⤵

All the ruler's have good and bad sides according to their personality.

AURANGZEB:::-

Aurangzeb was a bad ruler. he always believes in war and not in peace. he was a very merciful leader. he was the worst ruler and just want to invade everything he have.he was a bad administrator but a religious person.

AKBAR :::-

He was merciless butchering men,women and children's. but after some year of merciless ruling he has a stable good rule. he has become a good ruler by prosperity and order. he was known as the greatest mughal emperor.

JAHANGIR :::-

he has lived a very good life in his time. he represent both self- assured power and the height of the mughal imperial splendour. he was known for his Imperial and imperial name means the conqueror of the world.

SHAH JAHAN:::-

Shah jahan was a great leader. he has learned military skills at a very early age. jahan named as the king of the world. he has a long line of successful mughal emperor. He has built Taj Mahal for his wife Mumtaz to show his love.

BABUR:::-

He is known as the commander of genius. he was a very good ruler and he ruled over for 300 years in India. Babar was the first mughal emperor.

HUMAYUN:::-

he was the second mughal ruler. he has ruled over Afghanistan, Pakistan, Northern India and Bangladesh . he has lost the emperor to Sher Shah Suri but regain them 15 years later .

{\huge{\boxed{\mathcal{\pink{hope\:it\:helps}}}}}

Similar questions