GOOGLE- A SUBSTITUTE OF HUMAN TEACHER DEBATE TOPIC
Answers
Answer:
GOOGLE- A SUBSTITUTE OF HUMAN TEACHER
Good morning everyone present; I am here to express my views o ‘GOOGLE- A SUBSTITUTE OF HUMAN TEACHER’. And I am going to speak against it.
Google can never replace a human teacher. Only a human teacher has the ability to start teaching a boy or girl from scratch. In order to operate Google, one needs to have basic literacy; that basic literacy can be taught only by a human teacher.
Google can give you infinite information; but it can’t teach you. Teaching is sharing or imparting knowledge. Brad Henry, an American politician has rightly said, “A good teacher can inspire hope, ignite the imagination, and instill a love of learning.” A great human teacher can do miracles, which no one else can do. Who does not know Miss Sullivan, Helen Keller’s great teacher who transformed the latter’s life. The day she arrived at Helen's house, Helen called that day the most important day of her life. Helen compared the arrival of her teacher to the shining of 'light of love' in her darkened life. Miss Sullivan took unprecedented pains to teach Helen manual alphabet. Since Helen was suffering from hearing as well as visual disabilities, Miss Sullivan really had to work very hard to teach Helen the alphabet. I believe Google could never have done what Miss Sullivan did.
The advantages of a human teacher are many. As sated above, only a human teacher can transform students’ life. A human teacher has the brain as well as the heart that can work many times faster than the processors of a machine. He has the values such as compassion, understanding, empathy, commitment, dedication, love, and sympathy for his students that no sophisticated machine or search engine can ever have.
In conclusion it can be said Google can never be a substitute for a human teacher.
Hope it helps❤
GOOGLE- A SUBSTITUTE OF HUMAN TEACHER
Good morning everyone present; I am here to express my views o ‘GOOGLE- A SUBSTITUTE OF HUMAN TEACHER’. And I am going to speak against it. Google can never replace a human teacher. Only a human teacher has the ability to start teaching a boy or girl from scratch. In order to operate Google, one needs to have basic literacy; that basic literacy can be taught only by a human teacher.
Google can give you infinite information; but it can’t teach you. Teaching is sharing or imparting knowledge. Brad Henry, an American politician has rightly said, “A good teacher can inspire hope, ignite the imagination, and instill a love of learning.” A great human teacher can do miracles, which no one else can do. Who does not know Miss Sullivan, Helen Keller’s great teacher who transformed the latter’s life. The day she arrived at Helen's house, Helen called that day the most important day of her life. Helen compared the arrival of her teacher to the shining of 'light of love' in her darkened life. Miss Sullivan took unprecedented pains to teach Helen manual alphabet. Since Helen was suffering from hearing as well as visual disabilities, Miss Sullivan really had to work very hard to teach Helen the alphabet. I believe Google could never have done what Miss Sullivan did.
The advantages of a human teacher are many. As sated above, only a human teacher can transform students’ life. A human teacher has the brain as well as the heart that can work many times faster than the processors of a machine. He has the values such as compassion, understanding, empathy, commitment, dedication, love, and sympathy for his students that no sophisticated machine or search engine can ever have. In conclusion it can be said Google can never be a substitute for a human teacher.