Science, asked by virushp6298, 11 months ago

Gravitational force is related to weight. List some points to justify this statement.

Answers

Answered by Kashmiripsyco
3

Answer:

bro its not weight its mass which is related to gravity

Explanation:

universal law of gravitation says that the gravitation force b/w two objects is directly proportional to the product of masses of duo and inversely proportional to the square of distance b/w them

HENCE PROVED

Answered by WarmIce
2

Explanation:Newton's equation first appeared in the Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, July 1687. It describes why that apple fell from that tree in that orchard in Lincolnshire. Whether or not that apple actually landed on Isaac Newton's head, as some stories would have it, this equation describes why you stay rooted to the ground, what locks the Earth in orbit around the sun and was used by Nasa engineers to send men to the moon.

It encapsulates the idea that all the particles of matter in the universe attract each other through the force of gravity – Newton's law tells us how strong that attraction is. The equation says that the force (F) between two objects is proportional to the product of their masses (m1 and m2), divided by the square of the distance between them. The remaining term in the equation, G, is the gravitational constant, which has to be measured by experiment and, as of 2007, US scientists have measured it at 6.693 × 10−11 cubic metres per kilogram second squared.

Newton came to the formula after studying the centuries of measurements from astronomers before him. Stargazers had spent millennia cataloguing the positions of the stars and planets in the night sky and, by the 17th century, the German astronomer and mathematician Johannes Kepler had worked out the geometry of these movements. By looking at the movement of Mars, Kepler had calculated that planets orbited the sun in elliptical paths and, in a kind of celestial clockwork, his three laws of planetary motion allowed astronomers to work out the position of the planets in the future based on data from past records.

Kepler's laws explain how the planets moved around the sun but not why. Newton filled in that gap by supposing there was a force acting between the bodies that were moving around each other.

The story goes that Newton saw an apple fall to the ground and it made him wonder why the fruit always fell straight to the ground; why did it not veer off to the left or right? According to his own laws of motion, anything that begins moving from a standing start is undergoing acceleration and, where there is acceleration, there must be a force. The apple started in the tree and landed on the Earth, which means there must be a force of attraction between the apple and the Earth.

And even if the apple were higher up in the tree, it would still feel this force of attraction with the Earth, reasoned Newton. In fact, the attraction shouldn't even stop at the top of a tree but carry on way up into the heavens. Which raised the question: if everything around the Earth should feel this force of attraction, including the moon, why doesn't our nearest neighbour fall and crash onto the surface of our planet in the same way as the apple did?

Newton concluded that the moon did feel the effect of the Earth's attractive force and that it was indeed falling towards Earth, but there was a very good reason why it didn't crash down. He used a thought experiment to explain his thinking: imagine you fired a cannonball horizontally from the top of a mountain on Earth. The ball would follow a curved trajectory as it moved forward and was attracted, by gravity, towards the ground at the same time. Fire the cannonball with more energy and it would land further away from the mountain, but it still would follow a curved trajectory in doing so.

Newton proposed that, if you fired the cannonball with enough energy, it could fly all the way around the Earth and never land, because the Earth would be curving away underneath the ball at the same rate as the ball fell. In other words, the ball would now be in orbit around the Earth.

And this is what happens with the moon – it is in freefall around the Earth but it moves fast enough so that the Earth's surface never quite "catches" it.

Newton's law tells us that the strength of the gravitational force between two objects drops off in the same way that a light gets dimmer as you move away from it, a relationship known mathematically as an inverse square law.

Similar questions