" Green Revolution is associated with loss of soil fertility". In the light of the statement, mention five problems caused modern farming methods.
Or
What are the limitations of the Green Revolution?
Answers
Answered by
3
<<HEY MATE HERE'S YOUR ANSWER>>
Limitations of the Green Revolution:
In spite of several achievements, the green revolution has several defects:
(i) More inequality among farmers (Inter-personal inequalities):
The new technology requires a huge amount of investment which can be only, afforded by the big farmers. Hence, these farmers are getting the absolute benefits of the green revolution and became comparatively more rich than farmers. This increases inequality in rural India
(ii) Regional inequality:
Benefits of the new technology remained concentrated in wheat growing area since green revolution remained limited to wheat for a number of years. These were thy regions of Punjab, Haryana and Western Uttar Pradesh. On account of the above reasons new agricultural strategy has led to an increase in regional inequalities.
(ii) The Question of Labour Absorption:
There is a general consensus that the adoption of new technology had reduced labour absorption in agriculture. The uneven regional growth was mainly responsible for the low absorption of labour within agriculture. The growth of output was also slow to generate adequate employment opportunities. The sudden rise in the demand for labour in these areas induced mechanisation and labour-saving practices in general.
(iv) Undesirable Social Consequences:
Some micro level socio-economic studies of green revolution areas have revealed certain undesirable social consequences of the green revolution. Many large farmers have evicted tenants as they now find it more profitable to cultivate land themselves.
Thus, a large number of tenants and share-croppers have lost their lands and have been forced to join the ranks of agricultural labourers. Wetlands have also attracted outsiders (non-agriculturists from nearby towns to invest capital in buying farms.
(v) Health Hazards:
The health hazards of the new technology can also not be lost sight of. Increased mechanization that has accompanied the modernisation of farm technology in green revolution areas carries with it the risk of incapitation due to accidents. The attitude of the Government towards the problems of treatment and rehabilitation of victims of accidents on farm machines is that of total ambivalence. Meagre compensation is provided to victims.
(vi) Change in Attitudes:
A healthy contribution of green revolution is the change in the attitudes of fanners in areas where the new agricultural strategy was practised. Increase in productivity in these areas has enhanced the status of agriculture from a low level subsistence activity to a money- making activity. The desire for better farming methods and better standard of living is growing up.
◆◆I HOPE IT WILL HELP YOU◆◆
MARK AS BRAINLIEST IF SATISFIED MATE
Limitations of the Green Revolution:
In spite of several achievements, the green revolution has several defects:
(i) More inequality among farmers (Inter-personal inequalities):
The new technology requires a huge amount of investment which can be only, afforded by the big farmers. Hence, these farmers are getting the absolute benefits of the green revolution and became comparatively more rich than farmers. This increases inequality in rural India
(ii) Regional inequality:
Benefits of the new technology remained concentrated in wheat growing area since green revolution remained limited to wheat for a number of years. These were thy regions of Punjab, Haryana and Western Uttar Pradesh. On account of the above reasons new agricultural strategy has led to an increase in regional inequalities.
(ii) The Question of Labour Absorption:
There is a general consensus that the adoption of new technology had reduced labour absorption in agriculture. The uneven regional growth was mainly responsible for the low absorption of labour within agriculture. The growth of output was also slow to generate adequate employment opportunities. The sudden rise in the demand for labour in these areas induced mechanisation and labour-saving practices in general.
(iv) Undesirable Social Consequences:
Some micro level socio-economic studies of green revolution areas have revealed certain undesirable social consequences of the green revolution. Many large farmers have evicted tenants as they now find it more profitable to cultivate land themselves.
Thus, a large number of tenants and share-croppers have lost their lands and have been forced to join the ranks of agricultural labourers. Wetlands have also attracted outsiders (non-agriculturists from nearby towns to invest capital in buying farms.
(v) Health Hazards:
The health hazards of the new technology can also not be lost sight of. Increased mechanization that has accompanied the modernisation of farm technology in green revolution areas carries with it the risk of incapitation due to accidents. The attitude of the Government towards the problems of treatment and rehabilitation of victims of accidents on farm machines is that of total ambivalence. Meagre compensation is provided to victims.
(vi) Change in Attitudes:
A healthy contribution of green revolution is the change in the attitudes of fanners in areas where the new agricultural strategy was practised. Increase in productivity in these areas has enhanced the status of agriculture from a low level subsistence activity to a money- making activity. The desire for better farming methods and better standard of living is growing up.
◆◆I HOPE IT WILL HELP YOU◆◆
MARK AS BRAINLIEST IF SATISFIED MATE
hiyagmailcom:
I think so u have jumbledmm
Answered by
2
1. It reduces the soil fertility
2. As it requires high irrigation the level of underground water table reduces.
3. it requires a high capital to start production based on Green revolution
2. As it requires high irrigation the level of underground water table reduces.
3. it requires a high capital to start production based on Green revolution
Similar questions